LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/General vs Regional Anesthesia Mortality Rates
Large Joints and Extremities

General vs Regional Anesthesia Mortality Rates

March 6, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

General vs Regional Anesthesia Mortality Rates
Source: Wikimedia Commons
Secondary#hipsurgery#generalanesthesia

Elderly folks wheeled into the emergency room may fare better by avoiding general anesthesia, says new work published in the March 2018 edition of the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.

The study is titled, “Impact of Anesthesia on Hospital Mortality and Morbidities in Geriatric Patients Following Emergency Hip Fracture Surgery.”

Chunyuan Qiu, M.D., with the Department of Anesthesiology, Kaiser Permanente, Baldwin Park Medical Center in Baldwin Park, California, co-author on the study, wrote, “We identified 16,695 patients 65 years of age and older who underwent hip fracture repairs between 2009 and 2014 through the Kaiser Permanente hip fracture registry and excluded pathologic or bilateral fractures.”

Dr. Qiu told OTW, “The risk and benefit of different anesthesia techniques have been illusive when using mortality as the end results. As a result, the standards of clinical practice of anesthesia vary greatly from person to person and medical centers to medical centers.”

“We believe this inconsistency is partially responsible for the diverse mortality range we encounter after elderly emergency hip fracture surgery, for example, 90-day mortality rates can have greater than a 5-fold difference, ranging from 5 to 30%.”

“Obviously, clarity for this issue is important not only for anesthesiologists, but also for guidelines and guidance for patient-centered clinical outcomes that are beyond any single healthcare subspecialty such as orthopedic surgery, anesthesiology, internal medicine, etc.”

“We used the data from a well-defined and validated total hip registry with a large sample size. The data is also over the last 10 years and thereby recent. Most importantly, this registry data is all from one a single Integrated Medical Delivery System.”

“This allowed us access to a large number of hip fracture patients, a strong dataset and the ability to match patients well. It enabled us to analyze them in a more robust way. Furthermore, this project is a collaboration of many individuals from different branches and hospitals in our medical system, from clinicians, research scientists, data scientist and statisticians.”

Advertisement

“Mortality profiles differ based on the anesthetics, where general anesthesia has a higher in-hospital mortality rate as compared to that of regional or neuraxial anesthesia. This result is independent from their comorbidities, age, gender, races, or type of the hip surgery.”

“For patients who are viable candidates, regional or neuraxial anesthesia should be considered as the preferred anesthesia technique for elderly emergent hip fracture patients.”

“Patient-centered multidisciplinary teamwork is critically important for the fragile and elderly hip fracture patient, given our growing and aging population. As the leader of the team, the orthopedic surgeon should advocate and coordinate the best practice from all subspecialists involving their patient, including the anesthesiologist.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy