LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Double OR Doors = Infection Risk!
Large Joints and Extremities

Double OR Doors = Infection Risk!

March 6, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Double OR Doors = Infection Risk!
Source: Wikimedia Commons and John Crawford
Secondary#operatingroom#orairflow

Double doors, double trouble…new research finds that opening two operating room (OR) doors simultaneously may allow contaminated air into the operating room.

The study, “The Effect of Door Opening on Positive Pressure and Airflow in Operating Rooms,” was published in the March 1, 2018 edition of the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Co-author Mitchell C. Weiser, M.D., with the Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York, told OTW, “Several studies in the last decade or so have suggested that door opening events during orthopaedic surgery are concerning for possibly increasing postoperative surgical site infection.”

“It is still unclear whether these risks are related to a change in operating room airflow patterns due to the door opening event, a possible loss of operating room positive pressure with resultant influx of contaminated air from the hallway outside the OR during door opening, or are door opening events simply markers of personnel entry into the room with bacterial shedding from these individuals as a cause of increased risk of postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs).”

“Our study was interested in evaluating if there were negative pressure events during door opening. Does the door used for entry into the OR affect the risk of negative pressure events? How do airflow patterns change with door opening?”

“This study utilized a block of empty operating rooms used for orthopaedic surgery. Door opening was simulated and pressure changes were monitored using handheld digital manometers. Changes in airflow patterns with door opening were visualized with smoke studies from a theatrical fog machine.”

“When only a single door was open at one time, there was no loss of positive pressure in the operating room. If two doors were open simultaneously (the main door and a substerile door), there was a loss of positive pressure with influx of contaminated air from the hallway.”

“Over 50% of door opening events take place during room and sterile tray set up. During this time, access to the OR is typically not restricted to the use of a single door. It is possible that there are simultaneous double door opening events during this time, allowing contaminated air into the operating room with possible contamination of the trays.”

“Operating rooms are supposed to be under positive pressure to prevent influx of contaminated air. The ability for the OR to maintain positive pressure is based on how well the operating room heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system is working. The HVAC system operation should be checked daily by the charge nurse and engineering. Access to the OR should be restricted to a single door during both room set up and the actual surgical procedure. Sterile instrument trays should be covered with sterile towels after opening until they are ready for use, in order to reduce the risk of contamination.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy