LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Study: Home Use of Chlorhexidine Not Helpful
Spine

Study: Home Use of Chlorhexidine Not Helpful

February 5, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study: Home Use of Chlorhexidine Not Helpful
Source: Pixabay
#spine#spinesurgerySecondary#infections#chlorhexidine

Preoperatively reducing bacterial count sounds smart, right? Well, it isn’t supported by the latest research.

A team from New York, including K. Daniel Riew, M.D., director of Cervical Spine Surgery at the Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian in Manhattan, has found that using chlorhexidine gluconate wipes at home before surgery wasn’t particularly beneficial. Their work, “No Clear Benefit of Chlorhexidine Use at Home Before Surgical Preparation,” appears in January 15, 2018 edition of The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedics Surgeons.

Dr. Riew told OTW, “When I got to Columbia, the department protocol was to use chlorhexidine (CHG) wipes to cleanse the surgical site the night before surgery. My personal protocol, which I have used since 2005, involves the following surgical prep: we square off the operative field with plastic drapes, do a pre-prep with alcohol foam and then do a standard CHG prep. It’s simple and doesn’t rely on the patient doing anything.”

“In over 2,000 posterior cervical spine cases since 2005, I have had zero infections. So I didn’t want to mess with my protocol. But I also wanted to be a team player and thought that the best way to determine if the at-home CHG made any difference was to do a study.”

“We reviewed the literature and found problems with most of the studies in the literature. These included the fact that the CHG manufacturer sponsored one of the studies and most of them just looked at bacterial counts on the day of surgery and before the surgical prep.”

“That made little sense to me.”

“If you do the CHG wipe the night before surgery and then sleep in a non-sterile bed, how is that going to help prevent infections? A good surgical prep will kill all bacteria, no matter how high the bacterial count and the pre-hospital diminution by some factor is not likely to be relevant, once you do a surgical prep. To use an analogy, if you are going to use an atom bomb, using some rubber bullets the night before to get rid of a few enemies seems like a waste of time, effort and rubber bullets to me.”

“We found that all 17 participants had no bacterial growth from their skin swab, following a standard surgical prep. Most importantly, there was no difference between using and not using CHG wipes the night before surgery. It appears that using CHG wipes the night before surgery has no benefits in decreasing bacterial counts, once a standard surgical prep is performed.”

Advertisement

“Our study suggests that if you do a standard surgical prep in the operating room, that prep will kill all skin organisms.”

“So decreasing the bacterial count before coming into the hospital may sound appealing, but it has little scientific merit when it comes to posterior cervical spine wounds. One could certainly argue that CHG wipes are not expensive and pose little risk. But one could make the same argument to advise patients to shower before coming in to the hospital. Neither is likely to affect skin bacterial counts after a standard surgical prep. But if it makes the surgeon and/or patient feel better, I don’t object. But don’t do it based on scientific evidence, because the evidence is flawed.”

“Finally, the reader should bear in mind that our findings may not be generalizable to other parts of the body that might have a higher bacterial count to begin with, such as the foot.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy