LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Rotator Cuff Tears Do Not Hurt Capsulolabral Repair Outcomes
Sports Medicine

Rotator Cuff Tears Do Not Hurt Capsulolabral Repair Outcomes

February 8, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Rotator Cuff Tears Do Not Hurt Capsulolabral Repair Outcomes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Mark Sobba
#rotatorcuff#rotatorcuffrepairSecondary#shoulderinjuries##arthroscopiccapsulolabralrepair#shoulderinstatility

In a recent article, “In Throwers With Posterior Instability, Rotator Cuff Tears Are Common but Do Not Affect Surgical Outcomes,”  published in the January 2018 issue of the American Journal of Orthopedics, researchers discovered that concomitant rotator cuff tears do not affect the outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for posterior shoulder instability in throwing athletes.

James P. Bradley, M.D., of the Burke and Bradley Orthopedics in Pittsburgh, PA, and colleagues at the start of their study hypothesized that having concomitant rotator cuff repairs while undergoing the surgery would result in poorer outcomes and return to play.

Then they measured preoperative and postoperative outcomes in 56 consecutive throwing athletes with unidirectional posterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair performed between January 1998 and December 2009 by Bradley. Outcomes measured included pain, stability, function, range of motion, strength and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) scores, as well as return to play. Patients with and without rotator cuff tears were compared.

According to the results, 24 (43%) of the athletes followed had both rotator cuff pathology and posterior capsulolabral pathology. All rotator cuff repairs were debrided. At a mean of 3.2 years, there was no significant differences in outcomes between both groups. Mean preoperative ASES scores for patients with rotator cuff tears improved significantly (t = –13.8, p < .001) as well as those for patients without the additional pathology (t = –8.9, p < .001). In addition, preoperative stability scores improved in both groups (p < .001). Bradley and colleagues also found that 92% (22/24) of the athletes with concomitant rotator cuff tears were able to return to sport (p = .414) and 67% returned at the same level (p = .430).

Bradley and colleagues wrote, “Arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction is successful in throwing athletes with [rotator cuff tears] treated with arthroscopic debridement. Unlike a previous study of throwing athletes’ outcomes after surgery for concomitant [superior labral anterior posterior] SLAP tears and RCTs [rotator cuff tears], this study of throwing athletes with concomitant posterior shoulder instability and RCTs found no difference in patient-reported outcome measures or return to play.”

They added, “There may be discrepancies in interpreting return-to-play between the two studies, but in the current study, 67% of those with concomitant RCTs achieved return to preinjury level of play. This is 10% higher than the rate reported in athletes with SLAP tears alone (57% and even higher than those with concomitant SLAP and RCTs.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy