LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Planning Spinal Fusion? Consider Each Level’s Load
Spine

Planning Spinal Fusion? Consider Each Level’s Load

February 16, 2018 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Planning Spinal Fusion? Consider Each Level’s Load
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Kaudris
#spinesurgerySecondary#sagittal#spinalload

Researchers in Germany looked at spinal loads before and after spinal fusion. Their finding? It’s important to examine each level individually to avoid sagittal imbalance. The study, “Regarding loads after spinal fusion, every level should be seen separately: a musculoskeletal analysis,” appears in the January 19, 2018 edition of the European Spine Journal. 

Achim Benditz, PD, Dr. med. habil., with the Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach in Germany said, “The more spinal fusions are done, the more important the sagittal balance gets. To know more about loads in single levels in theory the better sagittal balance can be restored during surgery. Not many studies have been made with real patient data after spinal fusion. Therefore, this collective is an important contribution to spinal surgery planning.”

The authors wrote, “The joint reaction forces of 52 patients were analyzed in proximo-distal and antero-posterior [AP] direction from the levels T12–L1 to L5–S1 using musculoskeletal simulations. In 104 simulations, pre-surgical forces were equal to post-surgical. The levels L4–L5 and T12–L1, however, showed increased spinal forces compression forces with higher sagittal displacement. Improved restoration of sagittal balance was accompanied by lower spinal load. AP shear stress, interestingly decreased with sagittal imbalance.”

“The most important findings are that every level must been seen separately and the distribution of spinal loads depends on every level. It is important to plan all spinal fusions regarding sagittal balance and especially spinal loads of every single level.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy