LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Telephone Counseling: Less Pain, More Mobility After Spine Surgery
Spine

Telephone Counseling: Less Pain, More Mobility After Spine Surgery

January 12, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Telephone Counseling: Less Pain, More Mobility After Spine Surgery
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Minister-president Rutte
Secondary

New research has found that patients who spend time on phone counseling sessions improve their engagement in physical therapy and improve outcomes among patients recovering from lumbar spine surgery.

The study, “Telephone-Based Intervention to Improve Rehabilitation Engagement After Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Prospective Lagged Controlled Trial,” was published in the January 8, 2018 edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Richard L. Skolasky, Jr., Sc.D., with the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, told OTW, “Experience and research has shown that recovery after lumbar spine surgery is highly variable—with up to 40% of patients experiencing continued pain and functional limitations and nearly 20% requiring reoperation.”

“We had previously demonstrated that a patient’s level of activation influenced how engaged they were in their post-operative physical therapy. We were interested in seeing if a brief telephone-based intervention could increase activation, support engagement in physical therapy, and improve post-operative health outcomes among patients recovering from lumbar spine surgery.”

“We had shown in earlier papers that we were able to increase activation and support engagement in physical therapy and home exercise. These improvements in health behavior lead to early improvements in health outcomes (pain, disability, and physical function) when compared to patients who did not receive the intervention. The focus of the current paper was whether these improvements were evident 2-3 years after surgery.”

The authors wrote, “In this study, 122 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing a decompression surgical procedure from December 2009 through August 2012 were enrolled. Participants were assigned, according to enrollment date, to health behavior change counseling or usual care.”

Dr. Skolasky commented to OTW, “We were able to document one-year improvements in health outcomes (pain, disability, and physical health) among patients who received our intervention compared to controls. These early improvements were driven by the early changes in health behavior that lead to increased engagement in physical therapy and home exercise.”

“As we had expected, the improvements in the intervention group were attenuated by 2 and 3 years after surgery. Our intervention was designed to increase engagement in the post-operative period (~12 weeks) and not to increase physical activity, etc. in the longer period of recovery.”

Advertisement

“While both groups end at similar outcomes by 2-3 years after surgery, the early improvements in health among patients in our intervention group should not be discounted. These patients are spending significantly less time in pain and with physical limitations. This may allow them to return to work or usual activities sooner and to experience an improved quality of life compared to their peers who did not receive our intervention.”

“The early post-operative period is an important time when patients should be encouraged to be fully engaged in their physical therapy and home exercise. This encouragement, in our study, took the form of identifying goals for recovery and determining barriers and solutions for engagement by using the principles and practices of motivational interviewing.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy