LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Positive Results for ConforMIS’ iTotal CR Knee System
Large Joints and Extremities

Positive Results for ConforMIS’ iTotal CR Knee System

January 19, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Positive Results for ConforMIS’ iTotal CR Knee System
iTotal CR Knee Replacement System / Courtesy of ConforMIS, Inc.
Secondary#knee#pain

ConforMIS, Inc., based in Billerica, Massachusetts, has announced the publication of a study in The Journal of Knee Surgery on December 14, 2017 (“Accuracy of Coronal Plane Mechanical Alignment in a Customized, Individually Made Total Knee Replacement with Patient-Specific Instrumentation”) that investigated the ability of the iTotal CR Knee Replacement System to restore coronal plane mechanical axis alignment in a patient’s leg.

Gary Levengood, M.D. at Sports Medicine South in Lawrenceville, Georgia, led the study, which involved 63 consecutive patients. Dr. Levengood performed the surgeries using the ConforMIS iTotal CR implant system and ConforMIS iJig patient specific instrumentation.

According to Dr. Levengood, “As our data shows, we were able to achieve precise alignment, with absolutely no outliers. Prior to using the ConforMIS iTotal CR, I utilized computer navigation to achieve a reproducible alignment; however, this added substantial time to my procedures and required surgical placement of tracking pins in each patient’s femur and tibia during the operation.”

“With the iTotal, I am provided a complete operative plan, from the CT [computed tomography] scan each patient gets prior to surgery. Based on these results, I have full confidence in the system to deliver consistent and improved surgical outcomes.”

Dr. Levengood told OTW, “The study was modeled on a study from the Journal of Arthroplasty that looked at MRI cutting blocks ‘Visioniare’ versus computer navigation and they had a large number of patients that had less the adequate alignment.”

“I had been using computer navigation for some time prior to looking at ConforMIS so I decided on my first couple of cases to see if the CT based pre-navigated blocks were accurate. After my first several cases I found they were quite accurate so I decided to do the next consecutive cases with computer navigation checking the prenavigated block cuts until I reached the number they had done in the Australian study.”

“The most important results were that with the CT based prenavigated blocks no patients were beyond three degrees of neutral alignment with the vast majority being at neutral alignment. This allowed me to replicate normal alignment on all my patients no matter the preop deformity or patient habitus. Hopefully, allowing the stresses on the implant to be minimized and to therefore increase long term survivorship.”

“CT based cutting blocks are superior to MRI based blocks and the iFit technology used by ConforMIS produces an accurate, reproducible result.”

“This was done in a community-based hospital setting with real world patients, that occur in a normal physician office setting. I think more research should be encouraged in community settings as I think it more accurately reflects the real world experience. I was also impressed by the engineers at ConforMIS and their ability to produce a product which allows a reproducible result. The ConforMIS cutting guides are extremely accurate and allow the surgeon to be more efficient.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy