LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Laminoplasty Is IT for Some Multilevel Myelopathy
Spine

Laminoplasty Is IT for Some Multilevel Myelopathy

January 5, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Laminoplasty Is IT for Some Multilevel Myelopathy
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Hellerhoff
Secondary

Vanderbilt and Emory Universities’ researchers have found that for the right patients, laminoplasty is the better surgical option than fusion-based alternatives for treating neck pain.

The study, “Laminoplasty Does Not Lead to Worsening Axial Neck Pain in the Properly Selected Patient With Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison With Laminectomy and Fusion,” appears in the December 15, 2017 edition of Spine.

Co-author John M. Rhee, M.D., member of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Emory University in Atlanta, told OTW, “Laminoplasty is a proven, effective operation for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy.”

“However, one criticism leveled against laminoplasty is that it may cause axial neck pain postoperatively. Previous studies have had conflicting results in this regard.”

“Regardless, our clinical observation has been that laminoplasty does not create neck pain in myelopathic patients who do not present with significant axial pain preoperatively if lordotic sagittal alignment is maintained.”

“In this study, we sought to compare patient reported neck pain and myelopathy outcomes after laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy.”

“All data was prospectively collected, but patients were selected to undergo laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion by the treating surgeon. Those without substantial preoperative axial neck pain complaints and who demonstrated neutral to lordotic sagittal alignment were treated with laminoplasty; those who did not meet these criteria were treated with laminectomy with fusion instead.”

“Laminoplasty did not lead to worsening axial neck pain scores at a minimum of one year postoperatively. In fact, there was a very slight, though not significant, decrease in axial neck pain scores after laminoplasty. Both laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion were associated with significantly improved, similar mJOA [modified Japanese Orthopedic Association] scores.”

Advertisement

“Many patients with multilevel myelopathy have appropriate sagittal alignment and do not have substantial neck pain complaints. In such patients, laminoplasty did not create postoperative axial neck pain but did significantly improve myelopathy outcomes.”

“Laminoplasty is not indicated in every patient with multilevel myelopathy. However, in those without substantial axial pain and who present with favorable alignment, we recommend it as the surgical procedure of choice over its fusion-based alternatives. In the appropriately selected patient, laminoplasty is the preferred option over its fusion-based alternatives since it does not create postoperative neck pain yet achieves similar neurologic outcomes while completely avoiding fusion.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy