LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/IlluminOss Medical Gets First FDA Ortho De Novo Clearance
Large Joints and Extremities

IlluminOss Medical Gets First FDA Ortho De Novo Clearance

January 11, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

IlluminOss Medical Gets First FDA Ortho De Novo Clearance
Source: IlluminOss Medical, Inc.
Secondary

IlluminOss Medical, Inc. has received FDA De Novo clearance for its bone stabilization system.

This is a big deal. The company says this is the first time the FDA’s orthopedic branch has granted such a clearance since the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) was amended in 2012 to allow a sponsor to submit a De Novo classification request to the FDA without first being required to submit a 510(k).

IlluminOss Bone Stabilization System

The IlluminOss Bone Stabilization System is for treatment of impending and actual pathological fractures of the humerus, radius and ulna from metastatic bone disease.

In a January 9, 2018 announcement, the company said the system incorporates the use of a thin-walled PET balloon that is infused with a liquid monomer and delivered in a minimally invasive fashion into the intramedullary canal of the bone through a small incision.

“Once the balloon is infused with monomer, it conforms to the shape of the patient’s specific bone. The surgeon then activates a light source which delivers visible light to the PET balloon, polymerizing the monomer. The cured, hardened implant provides longitudinal strength and rotational stability over the length of the implant, stabilizing the fracture,” states the company.

The system has been commercially available in international markets and been in clinical use since 2010. The company plans to start commercialization efforts in the U.S. in the second quarter of 2018.

Surgeons’ experiences with the product in the international markets, says the company, have reported “smaller incisions, shorter procedural times, faster return to patients’ daily living activities, with reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates for patients.”

Advertisement

Richard McGough, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, says the systems, “has significantly changed the way we are able to approach the treatment of certain impending and actual pathological fractures resulting from metastatic bone disease. We were able to offer patients a quick, reliable surgical option that minimized pain and hospitalization. We were also able to consolidate their treatments; in some cases, we moved from two-day admissions to outpatient surgery, and we were ultimately able to complete radiation much more quickly.”

John Healey, M.D. Chief of Orthopaedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, says since the device doesn’t violate the rotator cuff and can be inserted with reduced operative time and blood loss, “it relieves pain and restores function more effectively than alternative treatments, in my experience.”

De Novo Process

Devices that are classified through the De Novo process may be marketed and used as predicates for future 510(k) submissions.

Since 2010, the FDA has begun releasing summary documents for devices classified through the De Novo process. The summaries are intended to present a summary of the scientific evidence that served as the basis for the decision to grant a De Novo request. The De Novo summary also serves as a resource regarding the types of information necessary to support substantial equivalence for device manufacturers that may wish to use the device as a predicate for future 510(k) submissions.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy