LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/China Reprimands Medtronic Over Sovereignty of Taiwan
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

China Reprimands Medtronic Over Sovereignty of Taiwan

January 29, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

China Reprimands Medtronic Over Sovereignty of Taiwan
Photo creation by RRY Publications with images from Pixabay
#medtronicSecondary#china#changhaicyberspace

Questions over the sovereignty of Taiwan became more than just a political matter recently when China demanded apologies from foreign companies for listing Taiwan and other territories as countries on their websites.

According to a Reuters report, Medtronic Plc, an internationally known medical device maker headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, was one of the companies reprimanded along with Delta Air Lines and the Inditex-owned fashion brand Zara.

This comes after a Chinese regulatory authority suspended Marriott International Inc.’s Chinese website for listing Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau as separate countries in a customer questionnaire.

These moves from different regulatory authorities in the Chinese government highlight how sensitive this issue of sovereignty is, and how companies with business relationships with China need to be aware of any political implications their marketing material may have.

Hong Kong and Macau were previously European colonies before becoming a part of China and Tibet was annexed in 1950. The sovereignty of Taiwan is probably the biggest issue, because despite the island having its own democratic leader, China still considers Taiwan a part of its territories, giving the Chinese government the right to annex by force at any time.

A China-based Western businessman who declined to be named told Reuters, “It’s hard not to think that this is the shape of things to come for foreign companies, having to be even more careful about these sensitivities.”

Reuters reported that foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said in a regular briefing, “The companies that come to China should respect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, abide by China’s laws, and respect the feelings of the Chinese people. This is the minimum requirement of any company going to another country to carry out business and investment.”

For punishment for putting “Republic of China (Taiwan)” on its website, China’s internet regulator, the Shanghai Cyberspace Administration demanded that Medtronic issue a public apology which they did on social media and on their Chinese websites.

Advertisement

The statement said on the website said, “With regard to the page setting on the Medtronic website, Medtronic fully understands the Chinese government’s position on the relevant territorial issues and sincerely apologizes for causing public misconduct. We have adjusted the settings for the relevant webpage.”

“We also hope to take this opportunity to clarify that the page in question is actually a navigation tool for the website. Due to business needs and convenience from different regions, visitors using different languages can quickly find the relevant information. So [in] this drop-down list, there are different countries, regions and business areas, there are different language versions of the site navigation. We will be more thoughtful in the future from different parts of the site user experience.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy