LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Medicrea Sues K2M Over Poaching Allegations
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Medicrea Sues K2M Over Poaching Allegations

December 21, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Medicrea Sues K2M Over Poaching Allegations
Source: Pixabay
Secondary

Sales force and technology poaching allegations aren’t just for the likes of the orthopedics giants like Stryker Corporation and Zimmer Biomet, Inc. anymore. The smaller players are also getting into the action.

On November 8, 2017, France’s Medicrea Group filed a lawsuit against K2M Spine, Inc. and several other defendants over alleged misappropriation of Medicrea’s technology and poached sales reps. The lawsuit was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Medicrea is the developer and manufacturer of the UNiD™ Adaptive Spine Intelligence (ASI) technology, the first and only, according to the company, patient-specific spinal rod approved for use in the U.S.

According to court documents reported by MassDevice, Medicrea is seeking a temporary restraining order against K2M Spine and Kinetic Surgical, as well as former sales representatives Chad Jackson, Thom Thomas, Lauren Brown and William Haigh.

Medicrea alleges in the lawsuit that the defendants “are attempting to misappropriate Medicrea’s technology and eliminate the first mover competitive advantage Medicrea currently enjoys as a result of establishing this emerging market.”

In one example, Medicrea describes K2M Spine’s alleged “carefully orchestrated conspiracy” to gain access to confidential data. “Medicrea alleges that in September, Brown and Haigh were forwarded an e-mail between K2M sales executives and Kinetic’s owner, Joseph Furtek, which included details about Brown and Haigh’s hiring as well as information about K2M’s meetings with two Medicrea customers who worked with Brown and Haigh,” states the MassDevice report.

The e-mail also allegedly detailed K2M’s plans to convert business from those two clients. The company alleges that Haigh tried, unsuccessfully, to delete copies of that particular e-mail chain.

Medicrea also claimed that Brown tried to erase all records on her company-owned phone and laptop in early October. Later that month, Brown allegedly visited a Medicrea customer as a K2M sales associate, which the company said violates her non-competition agreement.

Advertisement

The judge ordered K2M to show cause by the end of November as to why a temporary restraining order is not needed. The judge also denied Medicrea’s request to proceed ex parte. No further news has been reported on the case.

Medicrea has 175 employees worldwide, which includes 50 based in the U.S. The company has a manufacturing facility in Lyon, France housing the development and production of 3D-printed titanium patient-specific implants.

K2M had total 2017 third quarter revenue of $62.7 million, up 6% year-over-year. Medicrea’s 2017 third quarter revenue totaled €6.4 million, down 5% year-over-year.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy