LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Sport Specialization Increases Lower Extremity Injuries in High School Athletes
Sports Medicine

Sport Specialization Increases Lower Extremity Injuries in High School Athletes

October 23, 2017 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Sport Specialization Increases Lower Extremity Injuries in High School Athletes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Runner1928
Secondary

In a study, “A Prospective Study on the Effect of Sport Specialization on Lower Extremity Injury Rates in High School Athletes” published in the October, 2017 issue of The American Journal of Sports Medicine, University of Wisconsin researchers found that high school athletes with moderate or high sport specialization are at a higher risk for lower extremity injuries than athletes with low specialization.

The study included 1,544 participants, about half of them female, who competed in 2,843 athletic seasons. Sport specialization was classified as low, moderate or high.

According to the data, the incidence of lower extremity injuries (LEIs) was higher for those athletes with high (P = .02) and moderate specialization (P = .03) compared to athletes with low specialization. The most common LEIs were ankle (34.4%), knee (25.0%) and upper leg (12.7%), with 40.9% of them being ligament sprains.

The researchers wrote, “Sports medicine providers need to educate coaches, parents and interscholastic athletes regarding the increased risk of LEIs for athletes who specialize in a single sport.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy