LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Rugby: Match Exposure Linked to Injury Risk
Sports Medicine

Rugby: Match Exposure Linked to Injury Risk

October 30, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Rugby: Match Exposure Linked to Injury Risk
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Gerard Barrau
Secondary

In a recent study, “How Much Rugby Is Too Much? A Seven-Season Prospective Cohort Study of Match Exposure and Injury Risk in Professional Rugby Union Players,” published in the November, 2017 issue of Sports Medicine, Sean Williams, Ph.D., a lecturer with the University of Bath in Bath, United Kingdom and colleagues found that a player’s accumulated (12-month) and recent (1-month) match exposure substantially influences their current injury risk.

The researchers conducted a seven-season (2006/7-2012/13) prospective cohort study of time-loss injuries in 1,253 English premiership professional players. Both players’ 12-month match exposure (number of matches a player was involved in for 20 minutes or more) and 1-month match exposure (a number of full-game equivalent matches in preceding 30 days) were evaluated as risk factors for injury.

According to the data, the 12-month match exposure was associated with injury risk in a non-linear fashion. In addition, players who played fewer than approximately 15 or more than approximately 35 matches over the previous 12-month period were at greater risk for injury.

The researchers wrote, “Careful attention should be paid to planning the workloads and monitoring the responses of players involved in: (1) a high (≥≈35) number of matches in the previous year, (2) a low (<≈15) number of matches in the previous year, and (3) a low-moderate number of matches in previous year but who have played intensively in the recent past.”

Williams told OTW in an interview, “The results were broadly in line with what we expected; that those players involved in a very high (>≈35) or low (<≈15) number of matches in the previous 12 months were more susceptible to injury. It may be that those at the upper end were at a higher risk due to fatigue and the cumulative effects of match-play, whilst those at the lower end were perhaps under-prepared for the demands of competitive rugby. However, this requires further investigation.”

He added, “The most common injury we see in professional rugby union matches is concussion. The incidence of concussion has increased dramatically over the last five years, whilst all other contact injuries have remained stable. We think the rise is because we are much better at recognizing it, and because there is much greater awareness and knowledge about this injury across the game.

“The upper threshold for match exposure is likely to vary from position-to-position. Broadly speaking, our data suggests that participating in more than around 32-35 matches in a 12-month period is likely to increase a player’s susceptibility to injury. In reality, only the top 5% of professional players, those involved in international tours etc., are able to reach this level of match exposure.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy