LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Intra-articular Physeal Fracture Often Missed in Young Athletes
Sports Medicine

Intra-articular Physeal Fracture Often Missed in Young Athletes

October 23, 2017 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Intra-articular Physeal Fracture Often Missed in Young Athletes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Lance Cpl. Jacob Barber
Secondary

In a study, “Intra-articular Physeal Fractures of the Distal Femur: A Frequently Missed Diagnosis in Adolescent Athletes,” published in the October 2017 issue of the Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, researchers discovered that clinicians often miss intra-articular physeal fractures when evaluating skeletally immature athletes with acute knee injuries.

In a multicenter retrospective review of patients presenting with an intra-articular physeal fracture between 2006 and 2016 at three high-volume pediatric centers, differences between patients with and without complications were compared.

According to the data, out of 49 patients (mean age 13.5 years), the initial diagnosis was missed in 39% of the patients, and advanced imaging showed a greater mean displacement compared with radiograph (6mm vs 3mm).

All the patients were treated with surgery and were able to return to sport. Patients with wide-open growth plates, as well as those who are casted were more likely to have complications.

The researchers suggested that clinicians when presented with a young athlete with an acute knee injury should be more suspicious of an intra-articular physeal fracture.

They wrote, “Leg-length discrepancies and angular deformities are not uncommon, and patients should be monitored closely. Surgical outcomes are good when fractures are identified, with higher rates of return to sport.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy