LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Allograft Joint Restoration vs Metal and Plastic
Large Joints and Extremities

Allograft Joint Restoration vs Metal and Plastic

October 25, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Allograft Joint Restoration vs Metal and Plastic
Right Femur / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Bennyk95
Secondary

Biologic joint restoration using donor tissue instead of traditional metal and plastic may be an option for active patients with joint defects according to researchers at the University of Missouri (MU) School of Medicine.

A biologic joint repair typically takes longer to heal than does a traditional replacement. However, if a biologic repair is successful the patient will be able to return to full activity. Unfortunately, not all transplanted bone heals correctly. Researchers at the University of Missouri found that treating donor grafts with bone marrow aspirate concentrate before surgery both speeds recovery and improves bone integration.

“Surgeons performing biologic joint restoration surgeries typically only wash the donor bone to remove the marrow as a pretreatment before implanting the graft,” said James Cook, D.V.M., Ph.D., the William and Kathryn Allen Distinguished Chair in Orthopaedic Surgery at the MU School of Medicine.

“Once implanted, the recipient’s bone has to grow into the donor bone for the surgery to be successful. This graft integration involves a long process called ‘creeping substitution’ that can take more than a year to complete. The first six months are the most critical for success, so we have been studying ways to make this process better and faster.”

Cook’s team compared 17 biologic knee joint grafts implanted without bone marrow concentrate (BMC) to 29 grafts pretreated with BMC. They then compared post-surgical X-ray images at six weeks, three months and six months looking for evidence of graft integration and healing.

The grafts that had been pretreated with BMC achieved 43% bone integration at six weeks, compared to 25% of those that had not been treated. Likewise, at three months, pretreated grafts achieved 67% integration, compared to 50% of the untreated grafts. At six months, the researchers observed that the pretreated grafts were more than 84% fully integrated, compared to 74% of the untreated grafts.

Cook led a pre-clinical study earlier in 2017 that showed BMC provides cells to infiltrate the donor bone and release proteins important to bone healing. “To pretreat a graft with BMC, the patient’s bone marrow is collected at the start of the procedure,” Cook said. “It is processed in the operating room using a centrifuge to make a powerful concentrate containing the patient’s cells and proteins. The resulting BMC is used to saturate the donor bone before it is implanted into the patient’s joint.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy