LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/New Real-World Evidence Tools for FDA Approvals
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

New Real-World Evidence Tools for FDA Approvals

September 7, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Real-World Evidence Tools for FDA Approvals
Source: Pixabay and RRY Publications, LLC
Secondary

If you are a medical device manufacturer seeking premarket approval (PMA) for your device, your tool chest for evidence gathering just got a lot bigger.

The 21st Century Cures Act required the FDA to develop a framework and guidance for evaluating real-world evidence (RWE) and data (RWD) in approving new medical devices and medicines. In July 2016, FDA released a draft guidance on acceptable uses for RWE in the established medical device regulatory scheme.

On August 31, 2017, the agency released the final guidance.

This may turn out to be a big deal. The old rules regarding clinical studies still apply, but the guidance vastly expands the body of evidence the agency may now use in determining whether to approve medical devices. Traditional evidence has been from clinical studies conducted and provided to the FDA by the device sponsor. But the FDA knows there is a lot more out there. Sponsors can use the additional data to aid the FDA in reaching an approval decision.

Real-World Data

The guidance states that RWD includes data derived from electronic health records, claims and billing data, data from registries, patient-generated data including in home-use settings, and data gathered from other sources. The RWD sources can be used to support trial designs from randomized trials to observational studies. RWE can range from observational studies within an existing dataset to studies that incorporate planned interventions with or without randomization at the point of care.

“FDA recognizes that a wealth of data covering medical device experience exists and is routinely collected in the course of treatment and management of patients,” the agency said. Under certain circumstances RWD may constitute RWE, FDA says, “that may be of sufficient quality to help inform or augment FDA’s understanding of the benefit-risk profile of devices at various points in their life cycle, and could potentially be used to aid FDA in regulatory decision-making.”

The agency also noted that the guidance is a “cornerstone” of its strategic priority to build and implement the National Evaluation System for health Technology (NEST).

Advertisement

The FDA will use the guidance to evaluate whether RWD are of sufficient quality to support its regulatory decision-making. The agency may also use the aggregation of RWE to inform and implement postmarket control programs. However, the agency notes the new guidance “does not alter, or change in any way, the existing evidentiary standards use in regulatory decision-making.”

The bottom line. If you are planning a premarket approval application, consult with the FDA to see how RWE and RWD can be incorporated into your clinical design trials and evidence gathering process. Don’t leave an important new tool in the box.

To study the guidance, click here.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy