LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Customized Coumadin via Genetic Testing
Large Joints and Extremities

Customized Coumadin via Genetic Testing

September 28, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Customized Coumadin via Genetic Testing
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Hwaja Götz
Secondary

Dosing with warfarin (Coumadin) is not always clear. A new study, however, has found that genetic testing can help determine the safest dose of the blood thinner warfarin, with fewer side effects, in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery.

Their work, “Genetics Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis: Benefit of Pharmacogenetic Dosing,” appears in the September 26, 2017 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“Warfarin is very effective in preventing blood clots, but it’s very difficult to regulate,” explains Anne R. Bass, M.D., a rheumatologist at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in New York City and study co-author, in the September 26, 2017 news release. “About half of the population, because of genetic variants, is very sensitive to warfarin or has a very unpredictable or delayed response to the drug. This is the first study to show that adjusting the dose based on these genetic variants makes warfarin safer for patients.”

As written in the news release, “The multicenter clinical trial, known as GIFT (The Genetic Informatics Trial of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis) was funded by the National Institutes of Health [NIH]. Brian F. Gage, M.D., professor of Medicine at Washington University, served as principal investigator. Hospital for Special Surgery had the highest number of study participants—almost 1,000 joint replacement patients.”

“Investigators collected data on a total of 1,600 individuals age 65 and older undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received warfarin dosing based on clinical factors known to affect warfarin dose such as age, height and weight, gender, race, and other medications; the second group’s dose was based on these factors plus genetic variants. The study zeroed in on genetic variants in three genes, and this genetic information helped guide warfarin dosing during the first 11 days of treatment.”

Asked about adjusting the dose based on genetic variants, Dr. Bass told OTW, “Adjusting the warfarin dose without genetic variants and without a computer dosing algorithm can be tricky because different people respond to the warfarin differently, some are very sensitive and somewhat resistant. By using a dosing algorithm that can incorporate genetic variants dosing is made much less tricky.”

Regarding insurance coverage, Dr. Gage commented to OTW, “Currently, most insurance companies choose not to cover the cost of genetic testing. However, that decision could change if the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) choose to cover the cost of genotyping for Medicare beneficiaries.”

“First, pharmacogenetic dosing improves the safety of warfarin thromboprophylaxis among elderly patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Second, warfarin dosing algorithms are readily available through an NIH-supported non-profit website, www.WarfarinDosing.org,

but they require INR [international normalized ratio] monitoring (e.g., twice per week for the first couple weeks). Third, one month of warfarin prophylaxis with a target INR of either 1.8 or 2.5 was safe—no GIFT participant died, and most were discharged home on post-op day 1 or 2.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy