LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Targeting Senescent Cells Increases Bone Mass
Biologics

Targeting Senescent Cells Increases Bone Mass

August 31, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Targeting Senescent Cells Increases Bone Mass
Age and Bone Mass / Source: Wikimedia Commons
Secondary

Mayo Clinic researchers in Rochester, Minnesota, have found that targeting senescent cells—aging cells—led to an increase in bone mass and strength. The findings, titled “Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice” appear online in the August 21, 2017 edition of Nature Medicine.

“While we know from previous work that the accumulation of senescent cells causes tissue dysfunction, the role of cell senescence in osteoporosis up to this point has been unclear,” says Sundeep Khosla, M.D., director of the Aging Bone and Muscle program at Mayo Clinic’s Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging and a co-author on the study, in the August 21, 2017 news release.

“The novelty of this work for the bone field lies in the fact that, rather than targeting a bone-specific pathway, as is the case for all current treatments for osteoporosis, we targeted a fundamental aging process that has the potential to improve not only bone mass, but also alleviate other age-related conditions as a group.”

According the Mayo Clinic’s news release, “In the study, researchers used multiple approaches to target senescent cells in mice with established bone loss between 20 and 22 months of age. That’s the equivalent of over age 70 in humans. Approaches included using: a genetic model where senescent cells can be killed off; a pharmacological approach, where senolytic drugs previously developed at Mayo Clinic eliminate senescent cells; a Janus kinase inhibitor—a drug that blocks the activity of Janus kinase enzymes—to eliminate the toxic products produced by senescent cells.”

“The benefits on bone found in elderly mice were not evident in younger mice. That, coupled with the finding that the senolytic drugs were effective when given only intermittently, supports the link between senescent cells and age-related bone loss. Researchers administered a senolytic drug combination (dasatinib and quercetin) once per month to eliminate senescent cells.”

“Even though this senolytic drug combination was only present in the mice for a couple of hours, it eliminated senescent cells and had a long-lasting effect,” says James Kirkland, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Kogod Center on Aging and co-corresponding author of the study. “This is another piece of the mounting evidence that senolytic drugs are targeting basic aging processes and could have widespread application in treating multiple chronic diseases.”

Dr. Khosla commented to OTW, “To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that treating a fundamental aging mechanism that is present in all tissues—cellular senescence—can prevent bone loss with aging. This opens up the possibility of using compounds that target this mechanism in all tissues, thereby ameliorating or preventing multiple age-associated co-morbidities, including osteoporosis, frailty, vascular disease, and metabolic dysfunction. Our next steps are to continue to explore additional ‘senotherapeutic’ compounds in animal models and move the most promising of these to early phase human studies.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy