LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Predicting THA and TKA Patient Outcomes
Large Joints and Extremities

Predicting THA and TKA Patient Outcomes

August 24, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Predicting THA and TKA Patient Outcomes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Flavio Britto Callil
Secondary

To what degree can surgeons truly know which patients will benefit from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA)? New multicenter research says, essentially, not so much.

“Do Surgeon Expectations Predict Clinically Important Improvements in WOMAC Scores After THA and TKA?” appears in the September 2017 edition of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Hassan Ghomrawi, Ph.D., M.P.H., associate professor of surgery and pediatrics at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and co-author on the study told OTW, “Most of the efforts currently are focused on understanding patient expectations and their relationship to outcomes. Yet the decision to undergo elective joint replacement is a shared one that both the patient and the surgeon contribute to. We sought to understand the value of surgeon expectations.”

“This is a prospective cohort study. Orthopedic surgeons participating in this study are experienced high volume surgeons, so their expectations are assumed to be reasonably accurate based on their prior experience, and we used rigorous outcomes (the minimum clinically important difference or MCID) on patient reported outcome measures to determine if patients improved on their WOMAC [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index] scores. We did not simply rely on statistical difference.”

“Most patients improved in a clinically meaningful way after surgery; 79% of patients who underwent TKA achieved the minimum threshold for improvement in their function and 65% achieved the minimum threshold improvement in their pain relief. Surgeon preoperative expectations were predictive of improvement on WOMAC scores for THA patients; however, surgeons’ expectations were no better than chance in distinguishing between those who did or did not improve after surgery. Thus, our study suggests that the recommendations are not specific to me or my individual characteristics.”

“For THA patients, surgeon expectations can be used as a benchmark that we can compare patient expectations against. Educational interventions can then specifically target patients where discordance is present. For TKA patients, such benchmark is currently not present. Surgeons may need to spend more time with their patients to understand their needs and expectations.”

“Patients look to surgeons to predict the future for them when it comes to their surgeries. Tailoring these recommendations to be patient-centered or fitted to the individual is what we found in our study to be missing, and remains poorly understood. To make a more accurate prediction, surgeons may need to spend more time with their patients to understand their needs and expectations.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy