LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/One BMD, History Assessment Predicts Hip Fracture Risk
Large Joints and Extremities

One BMD, History Assessment Predicts Hip Fracture Risk

August 2, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

One BMD, History Assessment Predicts Hip Fracture Risk
Source: Wikimedia Commons and jplee 0203
Secondary

While there is ample research indicating the ability of bone mineral density (BMD) and other risk factors to predict fracture, we now have evidence showing that a single measure of BMD can predict hip fracture for up to 25 years reasonably well.

The study, “The Ability of a Single BMD and Fracture History Assessment to Predict Fracture Over 25 Years in Postmenopausal Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures,” was published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research on July 18, 2017.

Dennis M. Black, M.D., with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California, San Francisco, told OTW, “The study of osteoporotic fractures (SOF) is unique in having this long period of follow up to directly assess long- term patterns. SOF began with 10,000 women > age 65 in 1987 and has been continuously funded by NIH [National Institutes of Health] until just May of this year. We thought it would be interesting to look back on this very long and successful study.”

The authors wrote, “A single femoral neck BMD measurement strongly predicted long-term hip fracture risk to 25 years: 29.6% risk in the lowest BMD quartile versus 7.6% with the highest relative hazard…Lifetime hip fracture risk was similar (~30%) regardless of age from 67 to >80 years. History of hip fracture predicted hip fractures only slightly better than history of nonvertebral fracture.

Dr. Black commented to OTW “The key finds are that short-term and long-term risks of fractures remain very high even in women over 80. Clinicians should consider screening and treating these women who often fall under their clinical radar.”

“It was surprising to see that long-term risk of hip fracture was over 22% in older women over 80: many have hypothesized that risk goes down at this age due to increase in mortality. These women should be evaluated for potential treatment with effective agents that can reduce hip fracture risk by 40 to 50% and several are generic with almost no cost.”

“Also surprising how well a single measure of BMD predicted hip fracture for up to 25 years. This underscores the incredible value of BMD which is a stronger predictor of hip fracture than lipids or blood pressure are of heart disease.”

“Also, for orthopedic surgeons, these results also underscore the importance of fractures as predictors of future fracture and that all older people (men or women over age 50 to 60) who have a fracture should get formal evaluation for fracture risk and treated if indicated.”

“It is so important that patients with fractures be referred for BMD scans and evaluation for effective treatment to prevent fractures. Bisphosphonates, which are generic, are proven to reduce risk of vertebral fracture by up to 75% and hip fracture by 40 to 50%. There are oral bisphosphonates and an annual IV [intravenous] infusion. There other effective treatments as well. Most important that something is done to reduce risk after the first fracture.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy