LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Jury Awards $1.2 Million After “Negligent” Spine Surgery
Spine

Jury Awards $1.2 Million After “Negligent” Spine Surgery

August 3, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Jury Awards $1.2 Million After “Negligent” Spine Surgery
Source: Public Domain
Secondary
" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Jury_DrMichaelThomas_WEB.jpg?fit=220%2C281&ssl=1" src="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Jury_DrMichaelThomas_WEB.jpg?resize=220%2C281&ssl=1" alt="" width="220" height="281">
Michael Thomas, D.O.

In July 2011, Michael Thomas, D.O., a neurosurgeon in Washington State, performed spinal surgery on Emily Daley to treat her scoliosis.

Six years later, on July 31, 2017, a Washington state jury awarded Daley $1.2 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit because Thomas’s “negligent” surgery caused her severe spinal deformity.

The jury took six hours to deliberate after a seven-day trial. The jury agreed that the surgery left her spine in a forward and left-leaning position. Daley’s attorney said his client suffered from chronic pain for three years before having a different surgeon perform a corrective surgery.

According to a verdict form reported by Law360, the jury found that Thomas’ negligence was a proximate cause of Daley’s injuries and awarded her about $219,000 for past medical expenses and $1 million in noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering.

One of Daley’s attorneys said court records indicate that there has not been a jury verdict in favor of a medical negligence plaintiff in Yakima County in several years, which underscores the severity of the patient’s injuries and the doctor’s malpractice.

Daley file the suit in June 2015, claiming that Thomas and his practice, Cascade Neurosurgical Associates PLLC, negligently performed the surgery and failed to provide adequate post-operative treatment. The allegedly substandard care left Daley in severe and chronic pain for three years until it was finally corrected by a spinal surgeon in August 2014, Daley’s attorneys said.

The case is Emily Daley v. Michael Thomas D.O. et al., case number 15-2-01491-8, in the Washington State District Court, Yakima County.

Advertisement

Previous Sanctions

According to the Yakima Herald, this is not the first time Thomas’ care has been called into question.

Thomas was previously put on probation by the state Department of Health, after he was found to be under the influence of narcotics while performing a neck and spine operation in 2012.

The newspaper reported that when hospital colleagues reported “abnormal behavior” in the operating room during a March 2012 neck and spine surgery, Thomas tested positive for narcotics and benzodiazapines, according to state Department of Health documents.

The patient from that surgery suffered postoperative difficulties, the documents say.

Thomas had filled numerous painkiller prescription in late 2011 and early 2012 after undergoing back surgery himself.

After the operation in which he was removed from surgery, Thomas voluntarily completed inpatient treatment at the Washington Physicians’ Health Program, and then in 2014 reached a probation agreement with the Department of Health whereby he had to submit to random drug tests and be monitored by another physician.

According to the Department of Health website, Thomas’ medical license was last renewed in January 2015. As of January 2016, his credentials are expired.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy