LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/FDA Clears Osseus’ Cervical Implant
Spine

FDA Clears Osseus’ Cervical Implant

August 17, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Clears Osseus’ Cervical Implant
Gemini-C Cervical Interbody / Courtesy of Osseus
Secondary

On July 3, 2017, the FDA cleared Osseus Corporation’s new cervical interbody hybrid composition implant which incorporates rough, porous titanium with the radiolucent and biomechanical properties of PEEK. The newly commercialized implant is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease at one or two contiguous levels within the cervical spine.

Eric Hansen, chief executive officer of Osseus, commented to OTW, “During the building days of Osseus Fusion Systems, we had to bootstrap our way up as a self-funded, no venture-capital organization that consists of myself and my partner, Robert Pace, as well as a lean staff of six, three of which are engineers.”

“We wanted to compete in the 3D-printed and injection-modeled arena like other large companies, but both processes seemed out of range for many reasons. I am proud to say that in this very crowded industry, we have developed a product that is extremely unique. As we gathered our surgeon development team of orthopedic and neurosurgeons, our target was to create a robust fusion bed built from titanium to blend with PEEK allowing maximum radiolucent visualization.”

“During the design process of Gemini-C, we came up with many iterations and prototypes. We finally ended up with a proprietary way to blend and connect the two materials, avoiding the expensive prices of injection molding. The process and product that we invented will not shed or leach like many of the companies that are working with a post process and spray on method.”

“Since then we have forged our way into the 3D printed arena by hiring young, but sophisticated engineering minds that have experience with two of the top five national spine companies.”

“Osseus Fusion Systems is extremely focused on the engineering aspect of the organization. Our core focus is to create a broad product portfolio with new and exciting disruptive technologies within the spine implant industry. I believe entirely that this industry survives and thrives on small companies like Osseus to accelerate evolution and to create and develop new cutting-edge technologies.

“This industry has always depended on the ‘little guys’ for ingenuity and speed to market. I learned this with my first company, Surgical Dynamics, and my mentor, Henry Klyce, as we developed the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage. With the next venture, Blackstone Medical, I realized that the larger companies could not follow the path of evolution as quickly as a small, nimble private company could. I’ve come to find this to be extremely valuable to the industry. Our mission at Osseus is to create a team of inventive, entrepreneurial-spirited surgeons and engineers that can expedite and advance technologies while developing superior quality implants and equally important instruments.

Commenting to OTW on the future, Hansen noted, “Osseus will remain private with zero outside investment. Rob and I have managed to get over the hump with our own personal investment of over five million dollars. We are now running at a very sweet 38% EBITA, of which more than 80% of profit goes back into the company that allows us to fast track our product development queue. As we look to the future of this industry, we emulate and receive coaching from private companies like Arthrex and Reinhold Schmieding. We continue to have enormous faith that a privately-owned company can continue to survive and thrive in today’s spine market.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy