LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Amgen Osteoporosis Drug Rejected by FDA
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Amgen Osteoporosis Drug Rejected by FDA

July 21, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Amgen Osteoporosis Drug Rejected by FDA
Phase 3 study of romosozumab / Courtesy of marketrealist.com
Secondary

Amgen Inc.’s osteoporosis drug romosozumab (romo) has been rejected by the FDA.

On July 16, 2017, the company announced that its marketing application for the drug was rejected after missing a key secondary endpoint and running into recent safety issues. The FDA, according to the company, wants Amgen to include data from two late-stage studies—the ARCH study as well as a Phase III in men called the BRIDGE trial.

John Carroll, editor-in-chief of Endpoints News, asked the company why the data hadn’t already been supplied to the FDA. The study was completed more than a year ago. The company told Carroll, “Based on original discussions with FDA, the FRAME study was sufficient for initial BLA (Biologics License Application) submission. The pivotal 7,180-patient FRAME trial was the first to evaluate vertebral fracture risk reduction as early as one year as a primary endpoint.”

“During our interactions with the FDA, we agreed that the ARCH data should be considered in the regulatory review prior to the initial marketing authorization and, as a result, anticipated this request. We look forward to working through the review process with the Agency,” said Sean Harper, executive vice president of R&D at Amgen.

Carroll wrote that the drug “clearly vaulted the bar in Phase III for reducing vertebral fractures, with a hefty 75% risk reduction compared to a placebo plus denosumab. Investigators also were able to show a better safety profile in its presentation at the annual confab of the American Society for Bone Mineral Research. And there was an increase in bone mineral density among the drug arm in the study.”

However, he added that the drug also missed a key secondary endpoint in the pivotal program. “The drug did not significantly improve patients’ risk of non-vertebral fractures.”

In May, the company issued a note spelling out a disturbing cardio risk imbalance between romo and Fosamax; 2.5% for romo and 1.9% for Fosamax. The company, according to Carroll had expected an approval this summer, but regulators “made it clear they wanted to evaluate the full set of data in sizing up an approval.”

While Amgen and its competitors have angled for an approval, Carroll said commercial success is a completely different issue. “As The New York Times reported recently, patients are generally started on bisphosphonates like Fosamax, which are old and cheap. But they’re also limited, unable to build bone the way Forteo and the two new drugs are designed to do.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy