LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Xtant + Sites Medical Team up for Titanium Scaffold
Company News

Xtant + Sites Medical Team up for Titanium Scaffold

June 2, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Xtant + Sites Medical Team up for Titanium Scaffold
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Pui Shan Chan
Secondary

On May 16, 2016, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. announced a licensing agreement with Sites Medical LLC. Together, the two medtech leaders are bolstering Sites Medical’s OsteoSyn Ti technology, a premium porous titanium scaffold. The product will be available to both national and international markets.

Xtant is based in Belgrade, Montana and is a developer and manufacturer for renowned regenerative medical products. Specializing in devises for orthopedic and neurological surgeons, Xtant is well-known for implants, spinal disease instruments, tissue graft products for orthopedic disorders, and biologics aiding in foot, ankle and cranial surgeries.

Sites Medical in Fort Wayne, Indiana, played a critical role in healthcare reimbursement approaches, focusing exclusively on “Value-Driven Innovation” within orthopedics. Known for their impressive lineup or orthopedic implant devices and manufacturing prowess, Sites Medical prioritizes improving outcomes while simultaneously reducing costs.

Xtant CEO Carl O’Connell said, “We are very excited to work with Sites Medical. As market dynamics shift towards emerging titanium technologies, Sites Medical’s OsteoSync Ti technology places us firmly at the forefront of this trend.”

The Sites Medical leadership team is also excited about the partnership. President and CEO Greg Stalcup said, “We are thrilled to be partnering with Xtant Medical, a company with a rich history of innovation in the spine field. We look forward to working with the Xtant team to combine our respective technologies to deliver a new generation of high performance, high value products to the market.”

What is OsteoSync Ti?

The proprietary technology was crafted to tackle the needs of contemporary patients from both a clinical and economic perspective. The implant features incredible stability with a high friction co-efficiency. With open pore design and micro-texturing, it’s designed to encourage optimal bone ingrowth. In preclinical tests, bone attachment strength with OsteoSync Ti technology was almost twice as strong compared to titanium plasma sprays and seven times more effective than PEEK material in a five-week follow-up analysis.

Ultimately, these performance differences suggest clinical outcomes, particularly for those undergoing spinal fusion surgeries. Additionally, the technology was created to minimize “abrasion debris” that’s relatively common in implant insertion—offering more safeguards for patients.

Advertisement

Although OsteoSync Ti technology has been shown to perform phenomenally better, and safer, than its competitors, it’s also surprisingly economical. Both Xtant and Sites Medical agree it’s a breath of fresh air in today’s often costly healthcare industry.

Money Matters

Xtant’s second quarter metrics suggest the US market makeup that may utilize OsteoSync Ti tech hovers around $2.5 billion. The five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is near 4.75%. The first Xtant Medical products featuring the technology will be showcased at the North American Spine Society annual meeting October 25 – 28 in Orlando, Florida. Registration is open now.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy