LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Titan Spine: Record Sales and 1,000 Endoskeleton Implantations
Company News

Titan Spine: Record Sales and 1,000 Endoskeleton Implantations

May 23, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Titan Spine: Record Sales and 1,000 Endoskeleton Implantations
Courtesy of Titan Spine
Secondary

They might be popping champagne at Titan Spine’s offices in Wisconsin and Germany these days.

The company has achieved record sales revenue for the first quarter of 2017—and the company just exceeded 1,000 implantations of its Endoskeleton titanium interbody fusion devices featuring nanoLOCK surface technology.

The company reports in its April 24, 2017 news release, “Record quarterly sales for Q1 2017 that are significantly greater than prior year; nanoLOCK has been utilized to date by 74 surgeons in 52 hospitals across 26 states; nanoLOCK sales volume has increased by 270% since December 2016.”

Titan Spine Chief Commercial Officer Ted Bird commented, “Achieving record sales growth in the first quarter this year speaks to the accelerating demand for our surface-enhanced titanium interbody devices and an increasing appreciation of the importance of our proprietary nano-architecture in its ability to drive rapid osteogenesis…”

“Titan Spine offers a full line of Endoskeleton devices that feature Titan Spine’s proprietary nanoLOCK surface technology, consisting of a unique combination of roughened topographies at the macro, micro, and nano levels (MMN),” says the Titan Spine news release. “This unique combination of surface topographies is designed to create an optimal host-bone response and actively participate in the fusion process by promoting the upregulation of osteogenic and angiogenic factors necessary for bone growth, encouraging natural production of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), downregulating inflammatory factors, and creating the potential for a faster and more robust fusion.”

Steve Cichy, company executive vice president of sales, told OTW, “We are not providing specific numbers, but our growth over Q1 prior year was a record for our company and many multiples over current market growth rates, which means we are aggressively taking market share.”

“We are certainly pleased, but not surprised, by our record sales performance last quarter. It is a result of the steps we took in 2016 to set the stage for accelerated sales growth. Namely, we launched our next-generation nanoLOCK surface technology and tripled and reorganized our sales organization to better serve our customers. We knew both of these moves would cause short term disruption, but we are now enjoying the dividends of making them.”

“Reaching the 1,000 implant milestone for nanoLOCK in such a short amount of time is the culmination of a well-executed launch plan. It began with FDA clearance in November of 2014 that marked the first, and still only, nanotechnology clearance for spinal technologies.”

Advertisement

“We then spent the next 18 months carefully planning for its launch, which included the construction of a nanotechnology manufacturing and validation facility, building inventory, and the dramatic expansion of our sales organization.”

“During that time, we were also able to gain sole access to the CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] new technology code for nanotextured interbody devices, once again validating the uniqueness of our nanoLOCK surface technology. By the time of our first case in September of last year, we were well prepared to execute the rapid nanoLOCK adoption we see today.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy