LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Cleared Exprt Revision Hip Claims Saves Time and Money
Large Joints and Extremities

Cleared Exprt Revision Hip Claims Saves Time and Money

March 22, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Cleared Exprt Revision Hip Claims Saves Time and Money
Exprt Revision Hip / Courtesy of DJO Global
Secondary

DJO Global, Inc. says the company developed a revision hip which saves time and money in the OR. Now the company has FDA 510(k) clearance for its Exprt Revision Hip portfolio.

Price Point Efficiency

Mark Russell, the company’s surgical division’s senior vice president, said in a March 15, 2017 press release, “One of the biggest challenges our healthcare system encounters is introducing modern technologies at increased price points. The latest addition to the Exprt portfolio signifies our deep commitment to not only clinical outcomes, but both surgical and cost efficiencies.”

The “efficiencies” are due to a two-tray revision system which represents an 80-90% reduction in instruments compared to competitive systems, claims the company. “Streamlined instrumentation translates into less money and time spent on sterilization, less overall time in the operating suite, and less storage space—appropriate for both hospital and ASC settings.”

Michael Taunton, M.D. at the Mayo Clinic and design team member of the Exprt Platform was one of the first surgeons to implant the device. “Having a thoughtful approach to introducing new technology in today’s healthcare landscape will drive shifts in the market place. We designed DJO Global’s Exprt Revision Hip and Knee Systems to challenge conventional approaches to revision arthroplasty. These systems allow me to do what I used to think wasn’t possible—treat my patients with a high-quality implant with improved surgical efficiency and reproducible outcomes while simultaneously being economically responsible.”

The Exprt Device

The company claims the revision hip maximizes the femoral canal conformity by incorporating:

  • 3° taper geometry for axial stability
  • Optimized splines providing 0.2mm of press-fit on each side of the conical region
  • 3° bow on longest distal stem to accommodate the natural bow
  • Total construct lengths from 195-295mm
  • Anatomic anterior distal relief curved in multiple planes

Addressing the question of strength, the company said the Exprt consists of modular shot peened, distal femoral stems and proximal bodies secured with a taper junction and bolt. Successful fatigue load testing was carried out at 2,300N (517 lbs.) to 5 million cycles on worst case components. To further challenge the construct in this study, the potting depth was increased to 90mm below the center of the femoral head to create a larger moment arm and higher stresses.

Advertisement

The platform also comes with acetabular options and includes shells with proprietary P2 in-growth coating, HXe+ polyethylene and BIOLOX delta and CoCr femoral heads ranging from 22-44mm.

DJO Global’s products are marketed under a portfolio of brands including Aircast, Chattanooga, CMF, Compex, DonJoy, ProCare, DJO Surgical, Dr. Comfort and Exos.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy