LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/VTI: A Patent for InterCushion
Spine

VTI: A Patent for InterCushion

February 6, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

VTI: A Patent for InterCushion
InterCushion / Courtesy of Vertebral Technologies, Inc.,
Secondary

VTI (Vertebral Technologies, Inc.) has a new patent! A Minnesota-based company focused on the lumber spine solutions, VTI has been granted a new U.S. patent covering its modular, in vivo assembly technology and its motion preservation, InterCushion pipeline product.

“The grant of this patent expands and lengthens VTI’s protection of our unique in vivo expansion technology for minimally invasive lumbar spine solutions. VTI is a world leader in lumbar spine focused motion preservation/disc nucleus replacement technology. This patent exemplifies our continued commitment to protect and broaden our intellectual property portfolio in this space. We are encouraged by the clinical results we are seeing from clinical trials using VTI’s modular technology in our InterCushion product line,” commented Matthew R. Kyle, President and CEO of VTI, in the January 26, 2017 news release.

VTI’s InterCushion lumbar spine motion preservation product has been successful in reducing pain, preserving disc, and halting modic changes in clinical trials in Canada. Currently, several patients are at or near five years’ post implantation with continued clinically successful outcomes.

Philip de Muelenaere, an orthopedic surgeon based in Brandon, Canada, noted, “The potential value of an intervertebral nucleus replacement is linked to decreased future deterioration of the spinal motion segment. By maintaining disc height, the motion is maintained, stability is regained and long-term collapse prevented. This protects the patency of the foramina, and decreases facet arthrosis which, apart from being a pain generator, will compromise the exiting nerve root. The 5 year follow up MRI study proves that the prosthesis had maintained its position, maintained the disc height and kept the patients pain free.”

Matt Kyle commented to OTW, “VTI’s InterCushion implant design leverages the company’s patented in vivo assembly technology. In the case of the InterCushion, this equates to being able to implant a large, stable, uniform motion persevering device through a small annulotomy using MIS [minimally invasive surgery] techniques. The clinical results associated with patients at these longer-term follow up points are encouraging. This patent exemplifies our continued commitment to protect and broaden our intellectual property portfolio in this space.”

VTI Director of Marketing Brian Thron told OTW, “VTI’s marketing initiative for the next 3-6 months is to expose the brand and the company’s forward thinking technology to the spine industry and to spine surgeons who have never heard of VTI. We feel we have a great product that solves a problem for surgeons looking to do lumbar spine surgery at the L5-S1 area. We have a really cool product that is different from any other competing implants and it’s my job to get the word out to surgeons on this great technology!”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy