LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/THA and Variation in Functional Pelvic Tilt
Large Joints and Extremities

THA and Variation in Functional Pelvic Tilt

February 16, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

THA and Variation in Functional Pelvic Tilt
Source: Wikimedia Commons, Anonymous, Zhenxin Shen, Tania N Crotti, Kevin P McHugh, Kenichiro Matsuzaki, Ellen M Gravallese, Benjamin E Bierbaum and Steven R Goldring
Secondary

A multicenter study from Australia entitled, “Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty,” has found that you may be able to avoid problems with acetabular cup positioning if you do a preoperative assessment of functional pelvic position. The study appears in the February 2017 issue of The Bone & Joint Journal.

The authors, who were able to measure pelvic tilt in 1,517 patients who had total hip arthroplasty (THA), set out to quantify changes in pelvic tilt between different functional positions.

The authors wrote, “The mean pelvic tilt was 4.2° (-20.5° to 24.5°), -1.3° (-30.2° to 27.9°) and 0.6° (-42.0° to 41.3°) in the three positions, respectively. The mean sagittal pelvic rotation from supine to standing was -5.5° (-21.8° to 8.4°), from supine to flexed seated was -3.7° (-48.3° to 38.6°) and from standing to flexed seated was 1.8° (-51.8° to 39.5°). In 259 patients (17%), the extent of sagittal pelvic rotation could lead to functional malorientation of the acetabular component. Factoring in an intra-operative delivery error of ± 5° extends this risk to 51% of patients.”

Jim Pierrepont, a co-author on the study, is Research and Development Manager at Optimized Ortho in Australia. He commented to OTW, “We felt the recommended guidelines for the alignment of hip arthroplasty components were inadequate. They were based off static assessments of radiographic imaging from the 1970s. Many of the failure mechanisms associated with hip arthroplasty occur when the patients are performing functional activities such as rising from a chair, bending or twisting. So it seemed a logical step to analyze patients in more functionally relevant postures if we wanted to improve the guidelines for component orientation.”

“There were two main challenges. Firstly, defining a standardized protocol for imaging the patients in the required functional postures. Secondly, the difficulty in measuring the necessary spinopelvic parameters in a controlled manner across such a large cohort of patients. Each observer needed to be very well-trained and have a lot of spare time on their hands!”

“The target orientation for acetabular component alignment needs to be adjusted for each individual, based off an analysis of the way their pelvis moves during functionally relevant activities. A pre-operative assessment of a patient’s functional pelvic position can provide valuable information to avoid the failures associated with acetabular cup mal-positioning.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy