LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/SI-BONE’s iFuse: Exclusive Coverage Via HCSC
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

SI-BONE’s iFuse: Exclusive Coverage Via HCSC

January 16, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

SI-BONE’s iFuse: Exclusive Coverage Via HCSC
iFuse Implant System / Source: SI-BONE, Inc.
Secondary

SI-BONE, Inc., an international company with U.S. headquarters in San Jose, California, has announced that Health Care Service Corporation (HCSC), an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), has issued a positive medical policy exclusively for iFuse for MIS SI joint fusion. SI-BONE, makers of the iFuse Implant System, reports that this is the third private insurance company to issue a positive coverage policy for MIS SI joint fusion exclusively using iFuse; SelectHealth of Utah and Geisinger in Pennsylvania have already issues such policies.

According to the December 15, 2016 news release, “The policy summary states ‘based on professional societal organizations, literature reviews, in vitro studies, surveys, and cost-effective studies showing success and/or support for treating SIJ [sacroiliac joint] dysfunction with minimally invasive SIJ fusion, including a 2016 retrospective study group of patient surveys greater than 3 years, the evidence is sufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes. Therefore, minimally invasive SIJ fusion or stabilization, using titanium triangular implants or devices, for the treatment of back pain presumed to originate from the SIJ may be considered medically necessary when meeting all of the specific criteria.’”

As indicated by the company, “iFuse is the only SI joint fusion device in the U.S. with peer-reviewed publications detailing evidence from prospective trials, and is the only SI joint fusion device with a FDA-cleared indication citing clinical studies that demonstrate improvements in pain, patient function and quality of life.”

“The quality and quantity of clinical data supporting iFuse is compelling and was obviously a key element in enabling HCSC to establish exclusive coverage for iFuse, ” said Frank Phillips, M.D. of Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush in Chicago, Illinois. “Blue Cross Blue Shield patients make up a considerable part of my practice and now, those with SI joint pain caused by SI joint degeneration or disruption will have access to this clinically proven treatment.”

Dr. Phillips told OTW, “This is an important milestone for patients suffering from pain due to SI joint dysfunction. In recent years, carefully selected patients who were surgical candidates for SI joint fusion were unable to get treated because of reimbursement challenges and denials. This left many patients with no choice but to continue to rely on narcotic pain medications and other palliative and ineffective therapies. But now, BCBS patients who are surgical candidates in Texas, Illinois, Oklahoma, Montana and New Mexico will have access to iFuse, a clinically proven surgical treatment that can potentially enable them to return to a more normal lifestyle.”

“This is a significant step for surgeons in that we can now offer our patients a definitive surgical treatment for symptomatic SI joint degeneration or disruption. As a surgeon, telling patients that due to insurance issues there is nothing I can do to fix their problem when we both know a solution exists is frustrating and disheartening. I can now offer these patients the iFuse procedure that has been shown to be safe, effective, and durable, in high-level clinical trials.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy