LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/New Study: The Female Athlete Triad and Injury
Sports Medicine

New Study: The Female Athlete Triad and Injury

January 11, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Study: The Female Athlete Triad and Injury
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Denis Barthel
Secondary

Not aggressively treating the Female Athlete Triad could lead to potentially season-ending bone stress injury, according to new research published in the December issue of The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

The Female Athlete Triad is a syndrome in which eating disorders (or low energy availability), amenorrhoea/oligomenorrhoea, and decreased bone mineral density (osteoporosis and osteopenia) are present.

Researchers from Stanford University and Harvard Medical School categorized college athletes involved in 16 sports by risk level for bone stress injury—low, moderate, high—based on their Female Athlete Triad Cumulative Risk Assessment Score. Of the 239 athletes assigned a risk category, 61 (25.5%) were considered of moderate or high risk. The most common sports that these athletes were involved in were gymnastics, lacrosse, cross-country, swimming/diving, sailing and volleyball.

The next step was to review subsequent bone stress injuries. The researchers discovered that 25 athletes (10.5%) had experienced one or more. According to the data, those athletes in the moderate-risk group had double the risk of those in the low-risk group, and that risk almost quadrupled for those in the high risk category.

Another interesting finding was that cross-country runners accounted for most of the bone stress injuries (16; 64%).

One of the lead researchers, Adam S. Tenforde, M.D. of the Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Spaulding National Running Center and of the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation at Harvard Medical School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, explained to OTW that long-distance running causes “cumulative repetitive load on the skeleton.”

“We suspect both behaviors of cross-country athletes and demands of the sport places these athletes at high risk for injury.”

Tenforde added that “part of what has made the Triad challenging to manage is coming up with criteria to understand how to gauge risk for the athlete. This is one reason I think this article is important: It identifies that a significant number of elite female athletes are at moderate or high risk for the Triad.”

Advertisement

“The high likelihood for sustaining a bone stress injury (on average within one year of their score being determined) highlights this is not just a theoretical risk. There are consequences if Triad risk factors are not managed aggressively, including a potential season-ending injury.”

Screening questions for the Female Athlete Triad proposed by the Female Athlete Triad Coalition are available online. Positive response to one or more should prompt further evaluation.

“We need to be consistently screening all female athletes for Triad risk factors and manage these athletes appropriately to reduce risk for subsequent bone stress injury, ” Tenforde said.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy