LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/$10.5 Million for Providence Medical Technology
Company News

$10.5 Million for Providence Medical Technology

January 3, 2017 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

$10.5 Million for Providence Medical Technology
Photo creation by RRY Publications, LLC and Courtesy of Providence Medical Technology, Inc.
Secondary

Providence Medical Technology, Inc. has announced the closing of $10.5 million in new equity financing for the company. The proceeds will be used to further commercialize and expand its portfolio of cervical-fusion technology. New investor MVM Life Science Partners (MVM) led the financing and will join the Providence Board of Directors. Stanmore Medical Investments, Aphelion Capital, and existing private investors also participated in the round.

Providence CEO Jeff Smith commented in the December 19, 2016 news release, “I am thrilled MVM is joining our group of supportive investors. MVM’s deep scientific expertise and success globally commercializing medical technologies make them an ideal partner for Providence.”

Smith commented to OTW, “We did not initially receive 510k clearance for one of our earlier implants. We then focused on commercializing in Europe and succeeded in getting a CE Mark for that first generation implant in 2011. The design of our implants evolved and we were able to get 510k clearance for our cervical cages and screw systems by 2013. All of our implants and instruments are now FDA cleared and CE Marked.”

“When I met [neurosurgeon] Bruce McCormack, M.D., I was his spine rep at Kyphon. I was promoted to the role of Manager, Sales Operations and managed the integration of St. Francis Medical Technologies (X-STOP) after Kyphon acquired that business. My last role at Kyphon prior to the Medtronic acquisition was building and leading a national salesforce for Kyphon’s spinal diagnostics business selling Discyphor (F.A.D.) which was a product Kyphon acquired from Dr. Todd Alamin at Stanford. It was during these roles working at Kyphon’s home office in Sunnyvale that I got to know Art Taylor who would become our chairman and early investor at Providence.”

“Providence is focused on developing cervical fusion products. We have developed a tissue sparing approach to posterior cervical fusion (PCF). Spine surgeons use our products in the following applications:

  • foraminal stenosis in patients with cervical radiculopathy that have failed conservative case;
  • as part of a circumferential fusion, in addition to an ACDF, for patients with advanced pathology and risk factors for non-union; patients with symptomatic non-union from ACDF or failed cervical TDR;
  • patients with adjacent segment disease from previous cervical fusion.

Dr. McCormack told OTW, “Once the Medtronic acquisition went through in 2007, Jeff Smith was looking for more exciting opportunities than being a rep for a big strategic company. He approached me, in part because we had both attended Brown University. Jeff would hang out in the doctors’ office on Saturday mornings while I completed charts with the expectation that we would come up with an idea for a new company. After a month of Saturdays, we decided that posterior cervical fusion surgery needed innovation. The idea for Providence was born. Jeff quit his day job. We raised seed capital from friends and family. Biomechanical studies were done at the University of California San Francisco to validate some basic concepts. We next ran a clinical trial in the Philippines, which was successful. Our first attempts to get a 510k clearance were unsuccessful so we obtained a CE mark and did cases in Europe for several years. We altered the implant design and obtained a 510k clearance in 2013. We have been in the U.S. market for three years and are hitting our stride.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy