LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Kyocera 510(k) for Initia Total Hip System
Large Joints and Extremities

Kyocera 510(k) for Initia Total Hip System

December 14, 2016 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Kyocera 510(k) for Initia Total Hip System
Courtesy of Kyocera
Secondary

Kyocera Medical Corporation, a Japanese manufacturer of implantable systems and advanced ceramic components, has received the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) clearance for its Initia Total Hip System.

U.S. surgeons collaborated with Kyocera to develop the Initia Total Hip System which makes use of the company’s core technology. That technology is BIOCERAM AZUL® zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic femoral heads. Initia is also available with cobalt chrome femoral heads, giving surgeons the option of ceramic or metal heads matched to highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners.

The product is designed for distribution to a global population. The initial system includes a total of 16 tapered wedge stem sizes, 12 of which are available in the U.S. with both standard and high femoral offsets.

In addition to the Initia Total Hip System, Kyocera Medical makes its BIOCERAM AZUL ceramic material available to medical device original equipment manufacturers who demand a durable, high-quality, biocompatible solution for implantable components.

Kyocera International, Inc., headquartered in San Diego, California, serves as the U.S. sales and marketing arm for Kyocera Medical Corporation. Both companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Kyoto, a Japan-based Kyocera Corporation.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy