LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Fracture Liaison Services Showcased at IOF Regionals
Spine

Fracture Liaison Services Showcased at IOF Regionals

November 29, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Fracture Liaison Services Showcased at IOF Regionals
Sources: Wikimedia Commons and Sjbrown
Secondary

The recent International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Regionals 6th Asia-Pacific Osteoporosis Meeting highlighted the importance of implementing a coordinator-based Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) in clinics and hospitals.

According to the November 5, 2016 news release, “…studies have also shown that, where there is no FLS or similar service in place, approximately 80% of fragility fracture patients are neither assessed or treated for osteoporosis, the underlying cause of fractures.”

One of the studies presented was by Dr. C.-H. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Kaoshsiung Medical University, Taiwan. His 229 patient study of two hospitals found that the FLS was able to increase the rates of assessment and treatment, and has reduced mortality rates after fracture.

A Thai study of the FLS at the Police General Hospital, Bangkok, assessed the outcomes for hip fracture patients who participated at the hospital’s fracture service. It was found that, compared to a previous study, FLS improved the treatment rate of osteoporosis and helped to prevent secondary osteoporotic fractures.

A study from the Department of Orthopedics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, evaluated the outcomes of a local FLS network which includes five hospitals. The FLS network was able to significantly increase the rates of bone mineral density (BMD) assessment and osteoporosis treatment.

Professor Cyrus Cooper, chairman of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the IOF, stated, “Due to its vast and rapidly ageing populations, the Asia-Pacific region is in urgent need of effective FLS to stem the growing tide of osteoporosis-related fractures. These essential services are still rare in the Asian-Pacific and we hope that the strong FLS focus at the 6th Asia-Pacific Osteoporosis Meeting will serve to encourage the implementation of FLS more widely in hospitals throughout the region.”

Asked for details on the FLS, Professor Cooper told OTW, “An FLS is a model of patient care, with a coordinator (often a nurse) at its centre, which ensures that all fracture patients go through a systematic pathway to receive appropriate assessment, treatment and follow up. FLS are often implemented in clinics and hospitals which first respond to patients presenting with fractures. They ensure that the fracture is not simply repaired, but that the patient goes on to receive appropriate assessment, osteoporosis therapy, lifestyle advice, and fall prevention to prevent subsequent fractures.”

As for future challenges, he noted, “Studies have shown that the costs of implementing FLS result in long-term savings and considerable benefits to the patients. However, as with any investment in healthcare, authorities and hospital administrators do need to be persuaded to commit to the service and budget for its implementation and continued sustainability.”

“We encourage the orthopaedic community to champion the cause of FLS implementation in their clinics. Successful FLS have been shown to result in lower re-fracture rates, cost savings for the healthcare system and improvement in the quality of life of patients. As the healthcare professional who is a first responder and immediately involved with the fracture patient, orthopaedic surgeons play a crucial role in the identification of the fragility fracture patient, and in the successful operation of FLS services.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy