LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Good Results for S&N’s NPWT System
Large Joints and Extremities

Good Results for S&N’s NPWT System

October 17, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Good Results for S&N’s NPWT System
Smith & Nephew’s PICO System / Courtesy of Smith & Nephew
Secondary

Smith & Nephew plc has announced the publication of clinical evidence from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) highlighting improved patient outcomes following orthopedic surgery. A total of 220 patients undergoing primary hip or knee replacement compared the use of PICO, the company’s single use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) system, with standard dressings on closed surgical incisions.

Mr. Sudheer Karlakki, lead RCT author and consultant orthopaedic surgeon at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital in the UK, explained in the September 8, 2016 news release, “By introducing PICO as a prophylactic measure we have been able to demonstrate predictable wound healing following total hip and knee replacement procedures. Better wound management offers significant value to our hospital both in terms of reducing associated healthcare costs and by improving each patient’s outcome and experience.”

As indicated in the news release, “The use of PICO resulted in a four-fold reduction in the number of patients experiencing Grade 4 distribution of wound exudate within the dressing when compared with standard wound dressing in those undergoing joint replacement. There was also a four-fold decrease (from 8% to 2%) in superficial surgical site complications. A further benefit was shown in the significant reduction in the number of total dressing changes required per patient using PICO. Fewer dressing changes may lead to greater patient comfort and less burden on nursing resource. Taking into account reduced LOS [length of stay] for the study group, lower wound complications, lower dressing changes and potential cost savings for wound care in the community due to reduced wound complications in the study group, the authors believes the cost of the PICO is justifiable.”

Mr. Karlakki told OTW, “Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware that PICO is an invaluable wound dressing for managing high risk patients. The study has shown that the PICO system is able to deliver predictable outcomes in these patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients with a higher BMI [Body Mass Index], an ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] grade of -3, comorbidities or complex conditions such as diabetes, should be managed with PICO to reduce their length of stay in hospital and reduce the risk of post-surgical complications.”

“Our patients experiences of using the PICO system have been very positive. Patients who have had multiple hip replacements note the difference in healing time, with a reduced length of hospital stay enabling them to return to their daily lives more quickly. We have also had many encouraging comments about the comfort and discreteness of the dressing due to the negative pressure, and the reduced number of dressing changes is a huge benefit to our patients.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy