LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/The Brain Remembers “Phantom” Hands!
Large Joints and Extremities

The Brain Remembers “Phantom” Hands!

September 8, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

The Brain Remembers “Phantom” Hands!
This is a hand showing the colors used in the brain maps: 1-5: thumb (red); index (yellow); middle (green); ring (blue) and little finger (purple). Source: University of Oxford Hand Brain Lab
Secondary

New research has shown that a brain can remember the representation of an amputated hand—even decades later. A team of scientists from the University of Oxford Brain Lab have opened up a pathway to the possibility of controlling prosthetic limbs via the brain.

Team leader, Dr. Tamar Makin said in the August 30. 2016 news release, “It has been thought that the hand ‘picture’ in the brain, located in the primary somatosensory cortex, could only be maintained by regular sensory input from the hand. In fact, textbooks teach that the ‘picture’ will be ‘overwritten’ if its primary input stops. If that was the case, people who have undergone hand amputation would show extremely low or no activity related to its original focus in that brain area—in our case, the hand. However, we also know that people experience phantom sensations from amputated body parts, to the extent that someone asked to move a finger can ‘feel’ that movement.”

Study leader Sanne Kikkert told OTW, “One of the most mysterious questions about the brain’s ability to adaptively change to new circumstances is: what happens to the brain once a key input is lost (e.g. through amputation)? It has been thought that the hand representation in the brain, located in the primary somatosensory cortex, is maintained by regular sensory input from the hand. Indeed, textbooks teach that any sensory representation in the brain will be ‘overwritten’ if its primary input stops. Following this explanation, people who have undergone hand amputation would show extremely low or no activity related to its original focus in the brain area of the missing hand.

“However, we know that amputees often experience phantom sensations from their missing hand, such that when they are asked to move a phantom finger they can ‘feel’ that movement. In fact, some amputees experience exceptionally vivid phantom sensations, allowing them to move the individual fingers of their phantom hand. In this study, we were interested in finding how the representation of a missing hand is stored in the brain.

“Our results showed that the representation of the missing hand persisted even decades after amputation. In fact, the fine-grained finger information still matched well to that of two-handed controls, also tested in the study. Therefore, our results indicate that the brain ‘remembers’ the representation of an amputated hand, long after the sensory input is lost. It does not erase the original function of a brain area, as previously thought.

“The brain ‘remembers’ a missing hand, even decades after arm amputation. This representation of the missing hand is detailed and similar to that of two-handed controls. This representation could be used in the future for the more intuitive fine-grained control of neuroprosthetic arms.

“Our findings remove a barrier to the development neuroprosthetics (prosthetic limbs controlled directly by the brain): the assumption that a person would lose the brain representation that could control the prosthetic intuitively. If the brain retains a representation of the individual fingers, this could be exploited to provide the fine-grained control needed.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy