LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Stryker Acquires ReGen Biologics’ Meniscus Implant
Company News

Stryker Acquires ReGen Biologics’ Meniscus Implant

September 8, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Stryker Acquires ReGen Biologics’ Meniscus Implant
The Collagen Meniscus Implant / Source: Ivy Sports Medicine, LLC
Secondary

The long saga of Regen Biologics, Inc.’s Collagen Meniscus Implant (CMI) seems to have come to a happy ending with a September 1, 2016, announcement that Stryker Corporation’s Endoscopic division had acquired Ivy Sports Medicine, LLC.

Ivy Sports Medicine was the institutional investor in ReGen Biologics when the FDA rescinded ReGen’s approval of the company’s meniscus implant. That decision forced ReGen to declare bankruptcy, but Ivy Sports Medicine kept the product alive and continued with a suit against the FDA, arguing the rescission was unlawful and that the FDA should have followed the reclassification route if it wanted to reclassify the device.

It was one of the most heavy-handed exercises of FDA power we have witnessed and reported in a decade. The whole sordid episode included allegations of paying off members of Congress, an unlawful FDA process, two FDA panel hearings and some rolling of heads.

A U.S. district court agreed with the FDA, but the company appealed. Ivy Sports Medical won the appeal on a 2-1 vote of the judges.

Last November, Ivy Sports Medicine announced the first implantation of the CMI in the U.S. The surgery was performed by Wayne Gersoff, M.D. in Denver, Colorado.

Ivy Sports Medicine’s portfolio is comprised of a comprehensive minimally invasive meniscal repair platform. The addition of that portfolio enables Stryker to provide customers with a complete meniscal platform, and is also highly complementary to Stryker’s current portfolio of visualization, resection, fluid management, and ACL [anterior cruciate ligament] reconstruction platforms, according to the Stryker announcement.

CMI is the only FDA-approved collagen meniscus implant on the market. The company describes the CMI as a “reliable and innovative all-inside repair device, as well as an inside-out meniscal suturing platform.”

“The acquisition of Ivy Sports Medicine strengthens our capabilities and fits strategically with our current portfolio. Ivy’s complete meniscal platform, coupled with their clinical history, will allow us to provide our customers with multiple solutions to address meniscal repair, ” said Matt Moreau, vice president and general manager of Stryker’s Sports Medicine business. “This is an area of sports medicine where there is continued opportunity to address unmet customer needs. The Ivy portfolio provides a unique platform for us to build upon as we seek to continue advancing the treatment of meniscal injuries.”

Advertisement

No dollar amount of the acquisition was given.

Robert Pangia, CEO of Ivy Sports Medicine, said he and his colleagues are excited about the prospects of combining these products with Stryker’s distribution channels and complementary portfolio of sports medicine products.

Despite the FDA’s botched efforts, the CMI is alive. Now, with Stryker’s market clout, patients in the U.S. finally have full access to a therapy the rest of the world has experienced for years.

That’s a happy ending.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy