LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Protein/Peptide Combo and Gel Promote Bone Formation
Biologics

Protein/Peptide Combo and Gel Promote Bone Formation

September 6, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Protein/Peptide Combo and Gel Promote Bone Formation
Yellow arrowheads indicate newly formed bone / Source: Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Secondary

Using a mouse model, Japanese researchers have found out how to deliver a protein/peptide combination using an injectable gel carrier to promote bone formation in jawbones. The scientists, primarily from Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), have, according to the August 23, 2016 news release, “…injected a gelatin-based gel carrying OP3-4 and BMP -2 [bone morphogenic protein] into mice jawbones to trigger local augmentation of bone around the injection site.”

“Use of this injectable gelatin-based gel to carry the agents avoids the need for surgical implantation and resulted in no swelling or other such complications in the experimental mice. The researchers observed a region of increased bone mass around the BMP-2 + OP3-4 injection site that was larger than that seen in mice injected with BMP-2 alone, or with other controls. This mass also had a significantly higher bone mineral content and density.”

Corresponding author Kazuhiro Aoki, DDS, Ph.D. told OTW, “Since I am a dentist and always thinking [of] a better way to increase bone mass, I think this convenient and low-invasive method for increasing bone mass could be beneficial for all the dentists. This is the reason why we started this investigation. In the present situations, there is no method to increase bone mass without performing surgical procedures.

“The size of the newly formed bone was not the carrier-size dependent when this new method was applied.” The BMP-2-induced bone will not become bigger than the size of the carrier of BMP-2. Co-injection of our peptide with BMP-2 could accelerate proliferation of the mesenchymal cells which was induced by BMP-2 before starting calcification. This could be the reason why our peptide-co-injection accelerated bone mass than the size of the carrier, which is around 20 micron meter diameter size. One-time-injection could make the vertical bone augmentation! Like bone cement, the orthopedic surgeons would use for the fracture case after approval of this method for clinical applications.

“We could decrease the necessary amount of BMP-2 to increase bone mass. Since BMP-2 has been reported to cause inflammation and increase carcinogenesis in a spinal fusion, the reduced amount of BMP-2 could decrease the frequency of such adverse effects. This method could apply to a fracture case and a spinal fusion, but the appropriate amount of the materials for injections should be examined to prevent over growth of bone.”

Lead author Tomoki Uehara, DDS, told OTW, “For dental treatment, alveolar bone is very important. Alveolar bone loss may lead to tooth loss, and make it difficult to treat by denture and dental implant. In addition, congenital alveolar bone loss requires bone grafting. Therefore, alveolar bone formation is expected to be useful in various dental situations.

“In addition, there have been no known means of stimulating local bone formation without performing surgery so far. In our research, we could induce alveolar bone formation in mice by the low-invasive method of ‘injection.’ Since a single injection is easy and minimally invasive, our bone formation method might be useful for orthopedic surgeons as well as dental treatment.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy