LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Reduce Fracture Risk by Reviewing Medications!
Large Joints and Extremities

Reduce Fracture Risk by Reviewing Medications!

August 30, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Reduce Fracture Risk by Reviewing Medications!
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Secondary

A team of researchers from The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and the Boston University School of Public Health recently took a look at older adults who have had a fragility fracture and the medication they were taking. “Is it possible to reduce these patients’ exposure to drugs associated with fracture risk, ” asked lead author Jeffrey Munson, M.D., MSCE, assistant professor at The Dartmouth Institute, and his colleagues.

As indicated in the August 22, 2016 news release, “The researchers analyzed data from a sample of 168, 133 Medicare beneficiaries (84% of whom were women with an average age of 80) who experienced a fracture of the hip, shoulder or wrist (the most common type of fragility fractures). The researcher team identified 21 drug classes that have been associated with increased fracture risk. After examining them as a single group, they then subdivided them into three groups: those drugs thought to increase fracture risk by increasing the risk of falls, those that decrease bone density, and those in which the mechanism which caused greater fracture risk was unclear. Medicare Part D retail pharmacy claims were used to measure fills for prescriptions associated with increased fracture risk both before and after the fracture occurred.”

“The use of drugs that can contribute to elevated fracture risk was common among the group we studied, ” said lead author Jeffrey Munson, M.D., MSCE, assistant professor at The Dartmouth Institute. “To add to that, we did not see a consistent reduction in the use of these drugs after the fracture event. So that allows for the strong possibility we may be able to prevent at least some of these secondary fragility fractures through better management of high-risk drugs around the time of the first fracture.”

Dr. Munson told OTW, “This work is part of a larger initiative to study ways we can decrease the risk of second fractures. We know there are drugs that have been shown to increase the risk of fracture. We designed this study to understand whether physicians treating patients who have suffered a fracture take the opportunity to discontinue these medications.

“We found that the same number of patients are using high-risk medications before and after a fracture. This suggests physicians are missing an opportunity to discontinue at least some of the medications whose risks of a second fracture may outweigh their benefits. We also saw that some patients are leaving the hospital after a fracture with new medications that increase their risk of fracture. It is important for all physicians who treat patients with a fracture to review medication lists at the time of a fracture and at the time of discharge to be sure we aren’t exposing patients to unnecessary risk.

“Hopefully this will raise awareness of prescription medications as a modifiable risk factor that contributes to potentially avoidable second fractures. Ideally this work will also lead to the development of robust medication review processes for this high-risk population.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy