LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/New Drug Treats Bone Loss AND Diabetes
Large Joints and Extremities

New Drug Treats Bone Loss AND Diabetes

August 12, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Drug Treats Bone Loss AND Diabetes
Sources: Wikimedia Commons, Gtirouflet and Pixabay
Secondary

In a case of medical multitasking, researchers have developed a new class of drug candidates that can address bone loss as well as diabetes. The work was co-led by Patrick R. Griffin, Ph.D., a professor on the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI), and B. Lecka-Czernik, Ph.D., a professor at the University of Toledo.

As indicated in the July 27, 2016 news release, the study “…has shown that a new class of drug candidates developed at TSRI increases bone mass by expanding bone formation (deposition of new bone) and bone turnover (a normal process of replacement of old bone). A proper balance of these two processes is critical to healthy bone maintenance), and this balance is frequently negatively affected in diabetic patients. The result is a new dual-targeting drug candidate—or, as Griffin describes, ‘one drug addressing multiple therapeutic indications’—that could treat both diabetes and bone disease. The compound has been referenced as SR10171.”

Dr. Griffin and TSRI Associate Professor Theodore Kamenecka, Ph.D. have done prior work on molecules that increase sensitivity to insulin. Their new drug candidates “target a receptor known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma (PPARγ), a key regulator of stem cells controlling bone formation and bone resorption and a master regulator of fat. Anti-diabetic drugs known as glitazones (TZDs) target the PPARγ protein, but that interaction leads to severe bone loss and increased fractures. Stem cells in the bone marrow can differentiate either into bone cells or fat cells, and the glitazones drive them to fat at the expense of bone.”

“But SR10171 is designed to avoid this troubling outcome. In animal models treated with the compound, fat formation in the bone marrow was successfully blocked independent of their metabolic state (healthy or diabetic).”

“Using structural biology techniques and rational design synthetic chemistry, SR10171 was constructed to engage the PPARγ protein in a unique way possessing an optimal balance with the receptor’s other family member, PPARa, to treat diabetes and, at the same time, improve bone health, ” Dr. Griffin said. “This targeted polypharmacological approach demonstrates that the target isn’t the problem if you target it correctly.”

“SR10171 improves bone mass regardless of body mass index, normal to obese, ” Dr. Griffin added. “So you could use such a drug to treat osteoporosis whether patients are diabetic or not.”

Dr. Griffin told OTW, “While this compound has the potential to be used post-surgery to promote bone growth, its primary use would be as an adjuvant for current osteoporosis treatments. We expect to continue to study this compound and hope to eventually move it into clinical development.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy