LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/NASS Wants You to Contact Congress – NOW
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

NASS Wants You to Contact Congress – NOW

August 12, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

NASS Wants You to Contact Congress – NOW
Sources: Wikimedia Commons and National Archives and Records Administration
Secondary

The North American Spine Society (NASS) is calling all spine specialists to political arms.

The Society wants you to contact your U.S. House Representative immediately to ask them sign a letter co-authored by Reps. Larry Bucshon, MD (R-IN) and Ami Bera, MD (D-CA) urging CMS to revise the 10- and 90- day global services provision in the 2017 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS).

On July 15, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the PFS proposed rule for calendar year (CY) 2017 which includes a proposal to collect data for ALL 10- and 90-day global services from ALL practitioners who perform these services beginning January 1, 2017.

Specifically, says the Society, the proposal would require any physician who furnishes a procedure that is a 10- or 90-day global code to report the pre- and post-operative services furnished on a claim using a “G-code” for every 10 minute increment of services provided.

NASS is concerned that the CMS proposed rule disregards congressional mandate and will impose an undue administrative burden on spine specialists, disproportionately directing provider resources toward compliance and away from patient care.

The Society says Congress was united in opposition in 2015 to the policy in the CY 2015 PFS final rule that would have transitioned all 10- and 90-day global codes to 0-day global codes beginning in 2017, because of concerns that the change would compromise patient care and significantly increase administrative burdens.

“The proposal CMS included in the PFS for CY 2017 is a clear violation of current law as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) only requires CMS to gather information needed to value surgical services from a “representative sample” of physicians and to begin using those data in 2019 to facilitate accurate valuation of surgical services, ” states an August 12, 2016 alert.

The NASS Advocacy and Health Policy Councils are currently drafting a comment letter to CMS opposing the proposed 10- and 90-day global services provision. In addition, the NASS Advocacy team is meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill to educate members of Congress about this “ill-conceived proposal” and is working to collect signatures for a Congressional sign-on letter asking that CMS not implement this proposal in the final rule.

To find your Congressman or Congresswoman, click here and put your zip code in the upper right hand corner of the page: http://www.house.gov/representatives/

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy