LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Low Back Pain: Mesoblast Receives Best Basic Science Award
Spine

Low Back Pain: Mesoblast Receives Best Basic Science Award

August 9, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Low Back Pain: Mesoblast Receives Best Basic Science Award
Michael J. DePalma, M.D. / Courtesy of Michael J. DePalma, M.D.
Secondary

In an August 1, 2016 news release, Mesoblast Limited has announced that the 24-month results from the 100-patient, four-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial of its chronic low back pain (CLBP) product candidate MPC-06-ID were presented at the 24th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Spine Intervention Society (SIS) held in New Orleans July 27-30, and received the 2016 Best Basic Science Abstract award at the meeting.

Lead investigator and trial presenter Michael J. DePalma, M.D., president and medical director of Virginia iSpine Physicians, stated: “The long term results from this study indicate that a single injection of Mesoblast’s allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) into the disc of patients with moderate to severe CLBP due to degenerative disc disease was well tolerated and provided substantial improvement in pain and function over 24 months compared with control therapies.”

According to the news release, the following were some of trial results:

  • The procedure and treatment were well tolerated, without any significant differences in safety between cell-treated patients and controls.
  • The 6 million MPC dose, currently used in the ongoing Phase 3 trial, resulted in the greatest proportion of patients meeting the Phase 3 primary endpoint of Overall Treatment Success (the composite of both pain and functional responder status) through 24 months.
  • A significantly greater proportion of subjects who received 6 million MPCs achieved the pain responder criteria at both 12 and 24 months (50% pain reduction from baseline, as measured using a visual analog scale, with no intervention) than saline-treated controls (50.0% vs 12.5%, p=0.020); pain responder criteria were met by 36.0% of patients who received 18 million MPCs and by 23% who received hyaluronic acid.

The news release indicated, “Mesoblast’s ongoing Phase 3 trial is recruiting 360 patients across 30 sites in the United States and Australia, randomized 2:1 to receive either 6 million MPCs or saline control. The trial’s primary endpoint of Overall Treatment Success (using a composite of 50% improvement in lower back pain and 15 point improvement in function at both 12 and 24 months) is an acceptable endpoint for product approval, as per guidance from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Subject to further discussions with the FDA, Mesoblast anticipates being able to provide interim data from the trial in early 2017.”

Dr. DePalma told OTW, “Patients tolerated the MPC injections and an appreciable proportion of them experienced clinically meaningful improvement in low back pain after undergoing injection of the MPCs into a symptomatic lumbar disc. No other intradiscal biologic treatment has shown results like this while undergoing a randomized controlled investigation.”

“If MPCs demonstrate similar results in the Phase 3 study, many of the patients with chronic low back pain and a single dark disc on MRI may benefit from an injection with MPCs.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy