Physician-owned Humble Surgical Hospital, a multi-specialty surgical center (including spine and orthopedics, ) opened in August 2010 in the north Houston area.
Physician-Owned Hospital Bites Cigna for $13 Million

The physicians immediately began submitting claims for reimbursement to Cigna Health Insurance. Cigna paid the hospital’s claims for a few months based on negotiated agreements between the hospital and MultiPlan, Inc. or Viant Holdings, Inc., two third-party repricing entities that determined “allowable” amounts.
Then the insurer stopped paying and sued Humble in 2013 for overbilling for out-of-network services. Humble countersued.
On June 1, 2016, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt found that Cigna had subverted the plan administrator’s role for its own benefit by imposing a method of claims processing that was not part of its plan and was designed to deny the hospital’s claims. He then awarded the physicians more than $13 million for almost 600 unpaid claims.
The judge found that Cigna inappropriately applied exclusionary language to deny covered services.
“Cigna’s method for processing Humble’s claims was simply disingenuous and arbitrary, ” Hoyt wrote. “It was focused more on accomplishing a predetermined purpose: denying Humble’s claims.”
Hoyt found that Cigna owes Humble Surgical $11.4 million in unpaid claims, and because it stepped out of its role as a third-party claims administrator by rejecting the hospital’s proper claims and denying the hospital important plan documents, it owes another $2.3 million in penalties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
“In essence, ” Hoyt wrote, “Cigna ‘hijacked’ the plan administrator’s role and subverted it for its personal benefit.”
In its original complaint, Cigna demanded $5 million. It claimed that Humble Surgical had been overbilling it since 2010 by charging more than its share under the benefits plans, but charging patients only “nominal amounts, ” or nothing at all. It sought recovery under ERISA and Texas law.
“Indeed, ” wrote Hoyt, “Cigna’s unprecedented claims processing methodology and incessant related acts were extraordinary acts of bad faith.” In fact, according to a June 6, 2016 report from Courthouse News Service, Cigna could not identify any specific overpayments.
In addition to the $11.4 million in damages and $2.3 million in ERISA penalties, the insurer will also pay the hospital’s attorney fees, which will be determined at a later date.
It’s one for the little guy.

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.