LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Patient Positioning System Gains FDA Nod
Large Joints and Extremities

Patient Positioning System Gains FDA Nod

June 22, 2016 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Patient Positioning System Gains FDA Nod
Courtesy of Corin Group PLC
Secondary

The first technology that optimizes the orientation of a patient’s acetabular component by utilizing a laser guided Patient Specific Instrument platform has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Called the Optimized Positioning System (OPS), the system has been in use in Europe and Australia since its acquisition by Corin Group plc in 2014.

Jim Pierrepont, Corin’s Head of Procedural Technologies, said that the company is delighted to gain access to the U.S. market and be the first company to offer “such an exciting technology. This solution, ” he added, “ is a significant step forward in helping to improve the performance of total hip replacement, as conventional acetabular cup placement does not take into account the patient’s individual functional movement and relies instead on guidance for cup positioning defined some 36 years ago.”

Corin’s U.S. President Paul Berman said, “OPS is the first orthopedic technology to facilitate functional implant positioning without adding complexity or substantial cost to the surgical procedure.” Corin USA is a subsidiary of Corin Group plc and is located in Tampa, Florida.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy