LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Trials Test ALLOB for Spine Repair
Spine

Trials Test ALLOB for Spine Repair

May 24, 2016 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Trials Test ALLOB for Spine Repair
ALLOBT Tests / Courtesy of Bone Therapeutics LLC
Secondary

Bone Therapeutics SA’s ALLOB is a bone-forming cell therapy product used for the treatment of orthopedic conditions and bone diseases. It is being evaluated in three Phase I and II clinical trials for delayed-union fractures, spinal fusion and the revision of failed spinal fusions.

ALLOB has received orphan drug designation from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe and the FDA in the U.S. for two indications: osteonecrosis and osteogenesis imperfecta. ALLOB, Bone Therapeutics’ “off-the-shelf” bone cell product is created by harvesting of cells from a healthy donor, rather than from the treated patient.

Bone Therapeutics officials note that spinal fusion is considered the gold standard surgery for treating degenerative spine disorders. The process consists of bridging two or more vertebrae with the use of a cage and graft material. The intent is to fuse an unstable portion of the spine or immobilize a painful vertebral motion segment.

Despite the fact that spinal fusion surgery is routine, company officials claim that non-union and failure to relieve lower back pain remain the result of treatment in up to 30% of spinal fusion patients. Bone Therapeutics’ products, they say, are intended to improve the success rates of spinal fusion surgeries.

Founded in 2006, Bone Therapeutics is headquartered in Gosselies, (South of Brussels), Belgium. The company is developing a range of regenerative products containing osteoblastic bone-forming cells which may be administered via a minimally invasive percutaneous technique.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy