LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Foot & Ankle/MedShape: First Outcomes for Bunion System
Foot & Ankle

MedShape: First Outcomes for Bunion System

May 4, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

MedShape: First Outcomes for Bunion System
Courtesy of MedShape Inc.
Secondary

MedShape, Inc. is reporting on the first clinical outcomes with the FastForward Bunion Correction System. To date, FastForward has been implanted in over 100 hallux valgus (bunion) correction surgeries.

As indicated in the April 25, 2016 news release, “The FastForward system reduces the first-second intermetatarsal (IM) angle and controls first ray hypermobility via a patented tethering approach, thereby providing anatomic correction while still preserving and protecting the bone anatomy. Because there is no osteotomy or fusion performed, patients who receive the FastForward procedure are able to walk immediately in a surgical boot. With the anatomy-matching design of the Bone Tether Plate and by not requiring any drill holes through the second metatarsal, FastForward also reduces unwanted stress concentrations associated with other suture button tethering systems.”

Dawn Buratti, DPM, from Tarzana, California, was one of the first physicians to use the FastForward. She noted, “One of our first FastForward cases was a symptomatic juvenile hallux valgus deformity with significant first ray hypermobility. Traditionally, surgery would have been deferred until age 17 or 18, at which time the deformity would have likely progressed from moderate to severe. However, because the apparatus used in the FastForward procedure is placed mid-shaft, it does not interfere with the growth plates. We were able to provide a surgical option to reduce the IM angle and reduce first ray hypermobility via an intermetatarsal pseudoligament. Post-operative recovery was fully weight bearing in a cam walker boot for 6 weeks. Now 16 months post-surgery, the patient has maintained correction and participates in normal activities, including cheerleading. The procedure provided a nice alternative to what otherwise would have necessitated a lapidus fusion or a base wedge osteotomy.”

Jason Lin, M.D. from Good Samaritan Hospital in Corvallis, Oregon, commented, “The FastForward bunionectomy procedure has been a game changer for my practice. It has become my preferred technique for correction of most hallux valgus deformities. The FastForward is a reproducible system with a relatively quick learning curve and excellent clinical results. Compared to other techniques that require osteotomies or fusions, my patients have reported faster resolution of post-operative pain and swelling. In addition, I feel more comfortable allowing patients to transition back into normal footwear without fear of non-union. Radiographically, I have been impressed with the more anatomic appearance of the first metatarsal (vs. non-anatomic osteotomies), which allows for more reliable measurements of IM and hallux valgus angles, and with the ability to restore sesamoid position.”

Ken Gall. Ph.D., Chief Technology Officer for MedShape, told OTW, “The biggest challenge was developing an implant system that would not create any stress risers in the second metatarsal. The FastForward system first accomplishes this by eliminating drilling through the second metatarsal, instead wrapping the suture tape around the bone in a cow-hitch knot. Second, we were able to closely match the second metatarsal anatomy by leveraging 3-D printed titanium technology to manufacture the Bone Tether Plate. This design distributes the stresses optimally on the bone and a looped portion allows the suture tape to pass and securely hold the plate in place without the need for bone screws.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy