In a study that covered the entire Swedish population born between 1902 and 1952 (64 to 114 years old, this year), researchers found that individuals who had had a total knee replacement (TKR) had a 4% increased risk of hip fracture and a 19% increased risk for vertebral fracture. This was compared to the population which had not had a TKR. The researchers were from Sahlgrenska Academy in Molndal, Sweden, and the study was presented at the World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis & Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Massive Study Finds TKR Heightens Risk for Vertebral Fractures

A total of 3, 221 patients had experienced both a total knee replacement and a hip fracture. The hazard ratio (HR) for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) to have sustained a hip fracture during the ten years preceding their TKR was 0.58. At the end of the ten year period after their surgery it was 1.04.
The HR for patients with knee OA to have sustained a vertebral fracture during the ten years preceding TKR was 0.55 and during the ten year period after the surgery 1.19. The lower risk of hip or vertebral fracture before having a TKR and the increasing risk of hip or vertebral fracture after TKR remained after adjustment for age, gender, calendar year, and latitude. The HR for mortality the first year after TKR was 0.40 and 10 years following having a TKR it was 1.06
Lead author C. H. Vala, said, “Studies have shown that osteoarthritis is associated with higher bone mass, and, as well, there may be a decreased physical activity level due to pain. The increasing risk for hip and vertebral fracture in the 10 years after knee replacement may be explained by pain, increase of physical activity due to rehabilitation, and other biomechanical factors.”

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.