LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hand, Shoulder Surgeries at OP Centers: Few Complications
Large Joints and Extremities

Hand, Shoulder Surgeries at OP Centers: Few Complications

May 3, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hand, Shoulder Surgeries at OP Centers: Few Complications
Source: Wikimedia Commons and U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate Airman Apprentice Finley Williams
Secondary

Researchers have found that hand and shoulder surgeries performed at a freestanding, outpatient (OP) center resulted in few complications—0.2% in nearly 29, 000 patients over an 11-year period. The study, which took place at a freestanding ambulatory surgical center in Wexford, Pennsylvania, appears in the new issue of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Despite the increase in outpatient procedures, “there remains a paucity of literature on safety, ” said lead study author, Kanu S. Goyal, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, in the April 21, 2016 news release.

In this study, researchers reviewed the outcomes of 28, 737 procedures performed from 2001 to 2012 at a center specializing in hand and upper extremity surgery.

As indicated in the news release, “Cases were reviewed for adverse events including post-operative infection requiring intravenous antibiotics or return to the operating room, post-operative transfer to a hospital, wrong-site surgery, surgical items left in the patient, post-operative deep vein thrombosis (VTE) or blood clots, medication error, and other complications related to surgery.”

“There were 58 reportable adverse events for an overall complication rate of 0.2 percent: 14 patients sustained an infection, 18 required transfer to a hospital for additional care, and 21 were admitted to the hospital after discharge from the surgical center. There was one medication error and four post-operative blood clots. There were no cases of wrong-site surgery, retained surgical items or death.”

Dr. Goyal told OTW, “Patient selection for outpatient surgery at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center is critical to achieving a low adverse event rate. Guidelines for patient appropriateness may vary from center to center—but most focus on patient risk factors—American Society of Anesthesiologist class, history of cardiac or lung disease, BMI [body mass index], and history of infection, to name just a few. Some of these risk factors place the patient at risk of complication, whereas some place other patients being cared for at risk for complications (e.g., infection). Finally, the planned operation, complexity, duration and expected anesthesia are also important factors when deciding appropriateness for outpatient surgery at a freestanding center.”

“In general, achieving a low adverse event rate boils down to great patient care in the setting of low risk procedures in low risk patients. In our opinion, if there is any concern for patient safety preoperatively, then consideration for performing the operation in a hospital setting should be given—even if the estimated risk of adverse event is low.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy