LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Reprogrammed Stem Cells Treat Spinal Injuries
Spine

Reprogrammed Stem Cells Treat Spinal Injuries

April 26, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Reprogrammed Stem Cells Treat Spinal Injuries
Stem cells / Source: Wikimedia Commons and RebecaQuesta
Secondary

Researchers at the University of New South Wales, report that stem cell therapy may soon repair human spinal damage much like salamanders regrow their limbs. They claim to have developed a method for turning fat and bone cells into any other cell and their method could be subjected to human trials as early as next year.

Study author John Pimanda, M.D. said, “We have taken bone and fat cells, switched off their memory and converted them into stem cells so they can repair different cell types once they are put back inside the body.” The scientists call the cells “induced multipotent stem cells, ” or “iMS cells.”

According to Cosmos writer Vivian Richter, the researchers claim that their iMS cells are similar to the cells salamanders form around damaged tissue, which allow them to grow new limbs. “This technique is ground-breaking because iMS cells regenerate multiple tissue types, ” explained Pimanda.

The research team injected iMS cells into mice implanted with a bone graft and saw new marrow-filled bone and cartilage form around the transplant within 12 weeks. A similar bone implant of mice not injected with iMS cells did not show this level of regeneration, according to Richter.

Reprogramming cells to lose their memory and form a different cell type has been a valuable research tool for the researchers. But using these induced stem cells to treat tissue damage such as spinal injury in a patient has long been out of reach and unsuccessful. One problem is that the cells can form tumors. Other stem cells, isolated from embryos and reprogrammed for the same purpose, have had limited use because they are ethically controversial and cannot be programmed to form more than one cell type.

The method used by the New South Wales researchers involves treating fat or bone cells with a compound which relaxes the hard-wiring of the cell, followed by growth factors which prompt the cells to multiply.

“This technique is ground-breaking because iMS cells regenerate multiple tissue types, ” Pimanda explained. “We have taken bone and fat cells, switched off their memory and converted them into stem cells so they can repair different cell types once they are put back inside the body.”

The researcher’s sights are set on spinal implants, which heal poorly in 20% of recipients. Injecting iMS cells alongside the implant, the team hopes, will stimulate the implant to fuse with the surrounding tissue.

“The therapy has enormous potential for treating back and neck pain, spinal disc injury, joint and muscle degeneration and could also speed up recovery following complex surgeries where bones and joints need to integrate with the body, ” said University of New South Wales’ Ralph Mobbs, M.D., who will lead the human trial. “This represents a potential huge leap forward for spinal and orthopaedic procedures, ” he said.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy