LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/NYU Langone Evaluates Fitness Trackers
Spine

NYU Langone Evaluates Fitness Trackers

March 9, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

NYU Langone Evaluates Fitness Trackers
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Sam Sailor
Secondary

A study recently presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has undertaken the task of reviewing applications of fitness trackers as they might be used for orthopedic care.

“…fitness devices have the potential to transform orthopaedic care, ” said lead study author Claudette Lajam, M.D., an assistant professor of orthopaedic surgery at NYU Langone Medical Center, in the March 4, 2016 news release. “If we can get people more involved in their care and help them get in better shape, then everyone wins—patients, physicians, and the entire health care system.”

According to the news release, “The study analyzed activity tracking, cost, interfaces, location of devices on the body, and other relevant features for 28 health devices named the most popular by top consumer tech magazines. The most common features were a pedometer (tracking distance traveled), in addition to monitors for heart rate, sleep and caloric intake, although many other features were available.”

“Dr. Lajam said data generated by fitness devices can be applied across different levels of orthopaedic care: Non-surgical patients can track behavior, activity levels and medication use and alter these factors to lose weight and maintain the best possible function in their extremities; pre-operative patients can reduce risk for post-operative complications by reducing their weight, preventing diabetes through glucose monitoring, and identifying sleep disorders; post-operative patients can evaluate rehabilitation progress and surgical outcomes by measuring walking distances and stairs climbed, and alter physical therapy for better recovery.”

“If authorized by patients, this data also can be sent to their doctor and health care team, via apps that interface with Apple HealthKit, Google Fit, and Microsoft HealthVault and electronic medical record systems.”

Dr. Lajam told OTW, “One of the challenges was that there are so many devices on the market, and that this platform is a rapidly changing one. New devices and new applications are developed daily. It surprised us to learn how few studies have been done with regard to applications in orthopedics. There are barriers, mostly with regard to privacy rules for patient information.”

“These are out of the box, consumer products with built in sharing capacity. Collaboration and adaptation of these technologies could help surgeons and institutions manage patients better.”

Asked what she would like to see included in a new technology, Dr. Lajam commented to OTW, “It would be great to have apps that could be tailored to track post-operative metrics; specifically, pain, wound status, medication use, etc.”

As for questions Dr. Lajam received at the AAOS meeting, “We are getting some interest and lots of questions about privacy concerns and integration with the medical record.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy