LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/More Bad News on Sports Specialization
Sports Medicine

More Bad News on Sports Specialization

March 23, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

More Bad News on Sports Specialization
David Bell, Ph.D. / Courtesy of University of Wisconsin-Madison
Secondary

New research from the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that high school athletes from a smaller school were less likely to specialize in a sport than those attending a large school. The researchers also found that highly specialized athletes were more likely to report a history of overuse knee or hip injuries.

“Sport specialization is a hot topic in sports medicine, yet there is a severe lack of empirical data that exists about the topic, ” says UW-Madison’s David Bell, Ph.D., an assistant professor with the Department of Kinesiology’s Athletic Training Program and the director of the Wisconsin Injury in Sport Laboratory (WISL), in the March 7, 2016 news release. “Physicians are way ahead of the research in this area and, anecdotally, they report that they are seeing more kids in their clinics that have injuries that used to be only found in older athletes.”

According to the news release, a total of 302 high school athletes completed two different surveys, one on sport specialization and the other asking about injury history. Of those who completed the survey, 34.8% were classified as low specialization, 28.8% as moderate and 36.4% as high specialization. The surveys found that athletes from the small school were more likely to be classified in the low specialization group.

Dr. Bell told OTW, “We have been concerned about the increased trend in orthopedic injuries over the past 20 years. One common reason that seems to get blamed repeatedly is sport specialization. However, when you look into the literature there is a significant lack of empirical evidence linking specialization and injury. We can’t really answer basic questions like, ‘What percentage of athletes are specialized?’ If you can’t define the scope of the problem then we are really lacking some basic information about the problem…if there even is one. So we have a series of research studies investigating this topic.”

“I think we found three interesting findings. First about 35% of high school athletes are considered highly specialized and this is significantly higher than we anticipated. Second, we were able to link specialization and having a history of knee or hip injuries. Finally, we were able to show that high school size influences specialization with larger schools having a larger proportion of highly specialized athletes. We theorize this is due to more competition for limited roster spots.”

“Encourage your patients and parents to let their kids try out multiple sports. Ask parents to calculate how many hours per week and months per year their son or daughter is participating in organized sports. General recommendations are that kids should have a break and shouldn’t play their primary sport more than eight months per year. Another recommendation is that participation in organized sports shouldn’t be more hours per week than a child’s age (i.e., a 13 year old shouldn’t play more than 13 hours per week of organized sport…as a general rule of thumb).”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy